Peterson's Mistress Seeks To Stop Sale Of Nude Photos

NBC4.com ^ | Oct 21, 2003

[Jackie-O]

FR tooo slooow today.
Time for a humor break.
http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/Focus.swf

[melodie]

OK, now im freakin out. please forgive me for not enough java this morn, but, does anyone remember "the folks"? It was on rense.com. That woman predicted many things that i think were true about this case. now the 4th bouy goes to her favor again. Any takers on investigating this? I am illiterate pretty much, but will try to look into this.

[Jackie-O]

LMBBO!! That's to my bumm, I swear!

[CheneyChick]

Jackie, Jackie, Jackie. I can't believe you did that.

BTW, HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO SNOTTY!

[Velveeta]

ROFL!!! Ya got me!

[Velveeta]

Melodi, I noticed it too! Creepy, isn't it?

[geege]

Hope he's having a plesant birthday in jail

[Jackie-O]

Sorry, I'm feeling a little silly today...TGIF!
I have also been acused of "potty humor" in the past, so forgive me if you were offended! ;o)

[Jackie-O]

I for got to ping ya to #621. ;o)

[Jackie-O]

Make that 641.

[CheneyChick]

Ha ha ha. No worries. I laughed out loud.

[Jackie-O]

Me too! One of my co-workers sent that to me today and I opened it at 6AM, before I had my coffee...woke me up real quick with a godd hearty laugh!

[Sandylapper]

Perhaps so. But the sale of that man's business in no way involved Amber Frey. I still say that if a contract does not specify its terms, such as substitution of parties, then those terms do not apply to that contract. IMO, she would have had to agree to it.

First, Amber Frey was not under "contract". She went to the original nameless photographer to pursue a modeling career. The photographer had her answer some assanine personal questions and sign an agreement, which had some legally binding language on it, but I'm not sure exactly what the wording was. She was given the original copy of that agreement. When she decided to "forget the modeling career", she was offered her pics, but she declined and told the photographer to keep them. Later, that photographer sold his business. Without a doubt, an inventory was taken and due diligence was performed. All pics and agreements were listed and among them, was Amber's, so if there was no challenge at the time of the sale, all intellectual properties and corresponding documents (the agreement) became the property of the buyer. I believe that Schmidt has a legal right to have those pics in his possession and Amber relinquished her right to her own pics when she didn't take them. Maybe she didn't "know", but what's the old saying, "Ignorance is no excuse"? JMO

[Sandylapper]

No prob, Mags, I just couldn't believe that NE was publishing that trash in post #521--it sounded more like the Globe to me. NE is a little more credible these days. JMO

[Velveeta]

Mel, I went over to Rense and read through some of the what the "folks" had to say. There's a disclaimer on the site that says not to copy material, so I won't. But I can relate that Sandra posted that the folks told her the "5th buoy". She also said that Laci was hit "on top of her head" and strangled.

I wonder how far apart the 4th and 5th buoy's are from each other. Maybe he dumped somethings near one and some near the other. I don't usually believe in this psychic stuff, but this woman had her stuff documented way in advance and has been eerily correct in many instances.

She said early on that Chandra Levy is helping to bring up Laci's body and Laci turned up on Chandra's birthday.

(Cue spooky music, please)

[Sandylapper]

Sandy: Not MY birthday!! It's Sweetie Scotties birthday today.

WHEW and LOL! Would pay me to read more carefully, wouldn't it? Say, the molasses problem we're having--could it be the "geo-magnetic storm" we're having?

[Sandylapper]

Oh, dear!!! Another slight delay. Wednesday instead of Tuesday.

[Jackie-O]

Nah, its not the storm...the rest of the net has been real zippy for me, I think it's just FR.

[Velveeta]

Seems to be runner faster now. I'm convinced they're delaying another day just to irritate us.

Jackie and Lee were not in the courtroom today for baby boy's birthday celebration. Could it be the P's are figuring things out? The last time Lee was quoted in an article (yesterday, I think) was the first time that Lee never said anything about SP's innocence.

Those empty seats on his side spoke volumes.