Skip to comments.
SURFACE WARSHIPS: 21st Century PT Boat
StrategyPage.com ^
| October 20, 2003
Posted on 10/20/2003 10:55:53 AM PDT by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: John Jorsett
Looks like the old sub chasers.
I'm conflicted - I'd like to see it a little bigger - enough to handle a helo (which is the only way to project its power) and turbines vice diesels spinning variable pitch wheels.
OTOH, considering its mission, it seems a little bit big as it is.
To: John Jorsett
speed? Range?
3
posted on
10/20/2003 11:04:27 AM PDT
by
steve8714
To: John Jorsett
On April 23, 2002, the Military Sealift Command's USNS Walter S. Diehl was passing through the Straits of Hormuz when the six small power boats sped alongside. The Diehl does not look like a warship and probably appeared to be easy pickings. The Diehl fired flares to warn the small boats away, but the boats did not back down and a gunner opened fire with a .50-caliber machine gun. The Diehl's gunner kept firing as the ship moved ahead and the small boats then sped off.
Bet those pirates needed some fresh underwear?! I wonder how well this boat could repel something like happened to the USS Cole..
To: grobdriver
They could easily add some Javelins or TOW's to it as well.
5
posted on
10/20/2003 11:07:07 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: John Jorsett
Using infrared radar, they tracked the boat with four persons until it could be intercepted. There is no such thing as 'infrared radar'. Infrared refers to thermal vision using infrared sensative optics (cameras). Radar emits and receives a bounced radio signal. The acronym RADAR stands fro Radio Dection and Ranging.
6
posted on
10/20/2003 11:09:17 AM PDT
by
scooter2
To: AppyPappy
These look like a 3/4 size destroyer.
To: No Blue States
I wonder how well this boat could repel something like happened to the USS Cole.. Hell, they probably could have stopped that with an M-16 if they'd been ready for it.
8
posted on
10/20/2003 11:09:42 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: John Jorsett
Doesn't look much larger than my old sportfisher. Wonder what it's sea keeping abilities are?
9
posted on
10/20/2003 11:10:17 AM PDT
by
x1stcav
( HOOAHH!)
To: John Jorsett
PT stood for "Patrol" & "Torpedo" These things are more like British MGBs (Motor Gun Boats).
10
posted on
10/20/2003 11:12:38 AM PDT
by
Pilsner
To: John Jorsett; Poohbah; section9
Seriously, these are nice ships, but there are two problems that I see with them:
1. We need about two dozen more of them.
2. They need more firepower. Figure those Bofors 57mm guns, a CIWS, eight Harpoons, and possibly even a couple of ADCAPs.
Right now, these make a good basis for something the Coast Guard could use - but I'd like a lot mroe firepower for a vessel headed into harm's way.
11
posted on
10/20/2003 11:14:16 AM PDT
by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
To: scooter2
They probably used FLIR (Forward-Looking Infrared).
To: John Jorsett; harpseal
Their main role has been to ferry ship boarding teams to hot zones. Their "weapon" is the RHIB inflatable with an armed boarding party, either SEALs or (now) USCG. The ship just stands off and keeps watch.
13
posted on
10/20/2003 11:17:13 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: John Jorsett
They probably used FLIR (Forward-Looking Infrared). I meant to include a similar statement but got distracted by my lunch.
14
posted on
10/20/2003 11:18:45 AM PDT
by
scooter2
To: hchutch
By the time you finished adding all that armament, the ship is either (a) too damn big for the littoral combat mission or (b) it sank at pierside from overweight...
15
posted on
10/20/2003 11:34:44 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Poohbah
Yes, but the original PT had a tendency to be run down and cut in half by slower moving enemy ships os that it's commander could later become a war here. Can these new ones do that?
To: Held_to_Ransom
The WW II PT boat was a boat and was made of plywood. Marine grade plywood, of course.
17
posted on
10/20/2003 11:44:30 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Poohbah
Problem is, this thing's a sitting duck for anything havier than a Boghammer or two...
At least add a couple of Harpoons or ADCAPs or something to give it half a chance. The things can't outrun an Exocet or some other missile...
18
posted on
10/20/2003 11:51:50 AM PDT
by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
To: hchutch
Problem is, this thing's a sitting duck for anything havier than a Boghammer or two...That's not its mission.
At least add a couple of Harpoons or ADCAPs or something to give it half a chance. The things can't outrun an Exocet or some other missile...
And before you know it, you have a Perry-class frigate and Perry-class price tag, and, gosh, we can't afford enough of them.
19
posted on
10/20/2003 11:57:42 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Held_to_Ransom
"
Yes, but the original PT had a tendency to be run down and cut in half by slower moving enemy ships os that it's commander could later become a war here. Can these new ones do that?"
Not for the foreseeable future! LOL
20
posted on
10/20/2003 12:02:20 PM PDT
by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson