Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Clears Way for Medical Pot
aol news ^
| 10.15.03
| GINA HOLLAND,
Posted on 10/15/2003 3:39:59 AM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Justices turned down the Bush administration's request to consider whether the federal government can punish doctors for recommending or perhaps just talking about the benefits of the drug to sick patients.
for all you small goverment constitutionalists bush supporters out there just think about what bush was advocating here then go look in the mirror and repeat after me bush is a stalinist soviet and so am I for supporting him you will feel better and less like a hypocrite trust me
To: All
A Recall AND a Fundraiser? I'm toast. |
 |
Let's get this over with FAST. Please contribute! |
2
posted on
10/15/2003 3:40:57 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: freepatriot32
bush is a stalinist soviet and so am I for supporting him What a jerk!
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: freepatriot32
Well Bush is not alone here, what did Clinton do? -- or more importantly what didn't Clinton do. I don't remember similar acusations that Clinton was a Stalinist. Both parties are dirty in this war on drugs.
What's the deal here? Perhaps money? Lots of marijuana convictions means lots of easy jobs for lawyers and easy busts for cops who can show they are fighting the war on drugs and thus keep collecting easy federal money.
5
posted on
10/15/2003 3:59:20 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: freepatriot32
A war on medical marijuana patients is counterproductive and a waste of law enforcement resources. Do U.S Attorneys really want to prosecute terminally ill patients in federal court? It doesn't look good for them from a public relations standpoint even if they can make a prima facie case the use of marijuana remains illegal under federal law.
6
posted on
10/15/2003 4:00:15 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: AmericaUnited
Oh boy, 10 to 1 this is another anti WOD thread. Sometimes I really wish those losers would just Shut up. One wishes they could imagine for 5 seconds that no one really cares that they don't like anti drug laws. Then again, that would assume they could act like adults instead of like 4 year olds constantly nagging "I want a cookie, WaaaaaH".
7
posted on
10/15/2003 4:42:02 AM PDT
by
Havoc
(If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
To: rhombus
I don't remember similar acusations that Clinton was a Stalinist I accused him plenty-- before I even found FR. He is a Stalinist.
8
posted on
10/15/2003 5:20:59 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
To: Havoc
How about we sue all the DRug Warriors for a rebate on the Drug War?
You are free to have a stupid opinion, but we are free to pursue the wasters of our money and despoilers of our Constitution to their graves. Drug Warriors are no better than Stasi - to be spat on.
9
posted on
10/15/2003 5:54:26 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: freepatriot32
Policy supporters contend that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration must be allowed to protect the public.The Gob'mint knows best.
To: Havoc
Sometimes I really wish those losers would just Shut upAnother lover of Liberty, I see.
Show me the sentence in the US Constitution that grants the Federal Gob'mint the power to regulate the growth and use of a flower.
To: The Shootist
Show me the sentence in the US Constitution that grants the Federal Gob'mint the power to regulate the growth and use of a flower
Or... show me in the constitution where the govnment can regulate the private conversation of doctors and patients.
To: freepatriot32
I've always found the irony in this to be how this administration loves big government and tramples states' rights. Republican?
To: dighton; Petronski; Poohbah
Good:
for all you small goverment constitutionalists bush supporters out there just think about what bush was advocating here then go look in the mirror and repeat after me bush is a stalinist soviet and so am I for supporting him you will feel better and less like a hypocrite trust meBetter:
small goverment *CONSTITUTIONALISTS* -- ((bush supporters)) ... think!! about what *BUSH* was *ADVOCATING* here --- mirror!
Bush -- Stalinist... *SOVIET*!!
So am I!!! Less *HYPOCRITE*!
To: rhombus
It was a bi-partisan effort. Clinton started the case, Bush continued it. Nice to see the Dems and Reps can agree on something (namely, that the concept State's Rights should be killed off).
15
posted on
10/15/2003 7:01:13 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Havoc
So you're in favor of the government telling your doctor what medical advice he can or can't give? If so, maybe you belong over on DU.
16
posted on
10/15/2003 7:06:43 AM PDT
by
kegler4
To: Constitution Day
I don't know if this is going to be a surprise to anyone, but I favor medical marijuana, especially for chemo patients, AIDS patients, etc.
I just think it's too bad that for each one of these poor souls who benefit from medical marijuana even for purely palliative care in terminal cases, there will be four or five recreational drug users trying to leech off of the therepeutic system for a connection.
17
posted on
10/15/2003 7:43:42 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY*.)
To: Constitution Day
As for the *POINT* of your *POST*, well, *THAT'S* not *LOST* on me *EITHER*.
18
posted on
10/15/2003 7:45:37 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY*.)
To: Havoc
Shouldn't you be on a Rush Limbaugh thread explaining why he, unlike the average Joe caught in his position, shouldn't be facing a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence?
(Apologies in advance if you actually consistent and support putting Rush in jail for a decade and a half.)
19
posted on
10/15/2003 7:52:53 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Petronski
that depends on what the definition of "therapeutic" is!
For some folks, a glass of scotch whiskey, or Port wine, with a good stinky cigar works, some like to run marathons... others wish to light up a joint...
IMHO, If you do ONE (OR SIMILAR ACTS) and criticize those who smoke hemp, you are a hypocrite!
My favorite therapy is paddling a kayak, and generating lots of internal highs, but I also enjoy a good red wine, strong margaritas, and smoke an occasional bowl of hemp (or one of those stinky cigars)... and they are all THERAPEUTIC! Should I go to jail, or continue my successful life? I have lyme disease and can certainly have my doctor certify that it is good for me! And it ain't no business of yours, or anybody else that I don't affect!
20
posted on
10/15/2003 7:54:17 AM PDT
by
pageonetoo
(in God I trust, not the g'umt!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson