Posted on 10/12/2003 7:23:16 PM PDT by buzzyboop
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:37:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Yes, me too. I'll believe it is more than an isolated disruption in the Clintonista hold on the Dem Party when Terry McCauluff is fired. As long as the DNC is run by the ultimate Clinton crony, a man implicated in some of the worst abuses of the era, they are still corruption central as far as I'm concerned.
Twelve years ago that little known Arkansan was officially running for the position.
Right now that better known illinoisarkansanewyorkian is not officially running and won't
unless something changes to render W likely beatable. She has filed the necessary papers
just as she did for 2000 and would certainly take the nomination in the event that W
became incapacitated or was caught sending secrets to China (not a sin for Crats any more
than sending birthday cards to one's mother would be for someone else).If the Republicans
stay in good shape Mrs. Clinton will not run. Schwaz's victory has shown that the
Clintons' FBI files are of limited usefulness and they won't move based on the thought that
they can take out an opponent by releasing reams of BS and half true allegations
from the far past.It didn't work with Schwaz and Rush/drugs disaster is their
disaster not Rush's or ours because it will show them that even current dirt is no
longer very useful, because Republicans will learn from Rush and Schwaz how to handle it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.