Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards' support limited in state
The Daily Tar Heel ^ | 3/31/03 | India Autry

Posted on 03/31/2003 12:22:19 PM PST by LdSentinal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: TontoKowalski
I gave the wrong link:

PRO ESTRADA ACTIVIST THREAD

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/847037/posts
21 posted on 04/02/2003 3:40:51 PM PST by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Even some of the pathological left are dissing Edwards:

EDWARDS UPDATE( ref.:http://markarkleiman.blogspot.com/2003_03_01_markarkleiman_archive.html#200049658)

Todd Morman of Monkey Media Watch is displeased with my criticism of him and others for breaking up the John Edwards fund-raiser. He seems to endorse someone else's remark that he might have been "hyperventilating a little," but is upset that I used his account to accuse "unnamed liberals" of "massive hypocrisy."

First, to set the record straight. I didn't accuse "unnamed liberals" of anything, or accuse anyone of hypocrisy. I tried to make a point --and Morman's fury suggests that I succeeded -- about how and and others on the left would have reacted if it had been Republicans who decided to disrupt a fundraiser for a Presidential candidate by shoving and making noise in ways that made people afraid. In that context, I pointed out -- as I and others certainly would have pointed out in that hypothetical case -- that shoving and making noise in ways that made people afraid were the very same tactics used by Republican goons to shut down the Florida vote count. I didn't say that shutting down the fundraiser was as bad as shutting down the Florida vote count. It wasn't, because the stakes were so much lower: a vote count is much more important than a fund-raiser. What I did say is that it worked on the same principle: that the right to protest includes the right to disrupt.

But as to whether the protest did in fact break up the meeting by means of intimidation, I'll let you be the judge, based on Morman's own description:

The event, held at the Raleigh headquarters of the N.C. Democratic Party, was effectively disrupted by a crowd of about 200-300 using little more than drums and chanting (ok, and some shoving).

[snip]

For some reason, a large group of protesters was trying to stop police from closing the driveway's main entrance gate. Much shoving and yelling ensued, none of it pretty.

[snip]

While the police were able to keep the crowd off the Democrats' property, the escalating noise and confusion clearly rattled the folks inside, who were staring out the windows in growing numbers. Donors began to leave, confronting angry chants as they walked out.

[snip]

After twenty minutes of this, a wedge of police officers suddenly burst onto the scene at the back of the building. I didn't realize at the time that North Carolina's Democratic Presidential hopeful was in the middle of the flying V that zoomed past me, inches in front of my nose. I quickly learned it was indeed John Edwards who'd just been rushed past angry Democrats into the back entrance of his state party's headquarters. Not exactly a positive sign of Edwards' North Carolina support.

Now it's entirely possible that Morman's account, and the parallel account in Indymedia, were largely fictitious, and that nothing more happened than an ordinary protest where people gathered together and waved signs to let other people know they weren't happy about something. (Though Morman doesn't retract his earlier gloating assertion that Edwards had to enter the meeting under police guard.) If so, my post wrongly criticized the other people at the demo, and they're entitled to an apology.

But if the events happened as Morman said they happened. I repeat that what was done ought to be viewed as intolerable. Fundraising is, alas, a necessary part of politics. If you can break up fundraisers, you can stop a campaign cold. If the left establishes the precedent that doing so is fair play, we will regret it, sooner rather than later.

[Earlier post here.]

posted by Mark Kleiman at 9:51 AM

22 posted on 04/03/2003 1:18:51 PM PST by Helms ( ( NYT: ......The Old Grey Lady Formally Diagnosed- Senile Dementia))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I'm from North Carolina, just switched to the Republican party from Independent. After what I've seen from Democrats last few months, I'll never vote for another Democrat again, even Edwards. Doesn't matter if he is doing a good job or not.
23 posted on 04/05/2003 3:05:51 PM PST by Dergie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dergie
That's great news. Good for you.
24 posted on 04/05/2003 3:09:14 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson