Skip to comments.
Iowa Senate race: Oliver North to host fundraiser for Bill Salier
Posted on 03/25/2002 6:42:44 PM PST by nonliberal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: Dan from Michigan
No, Scott County is fairly marginal (Davenport; my mother grew up there; home of Ronald Reagan's first job, and the "science" of chiropractery (sp); my grandfather blackballed the founder (Palmer) from the local country club way back when). The GOP county is out west, but it is a huge outlyier, and for a very special reason. Hint: there is a certain resonance of it in Michigan. As for the Dem county, think Wastennaw and Dane counties.
41
posted on
04/01/2002 8:37:33 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
Ames I know is dem. What county is Iowa City?
Dane County? There is no Dane County in Michigan unless you mean that to be the Iowa college county.
The GOP one out west...Dutch country(Ottawa, Allegan, or Kent in Michigan) or mix of exurban refugees with money and rural socal conservatives(Livingston)?
To: Dan from Michigan
Dane County - Madison WI. (Washtenaw is Ann Arbor for those that don't know)
Gotta be Aimes or Iowa City.
To: Dan from Michigan
Yep, Iowa City, Johnson County. When in doubt, always pick the place with the more selective university. :) So you didn't pick up on my Michigan hint eh?
44
posted on
04/01/2002 8:54:44 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Dan from Michigan
Yes, Dutch country. Sioux County Iowa is mostly Dutch American. If you look at the voting stats, it simply leaps out at you. It is just, way, way out there. It voted 83% Bush, 15% Gore.
45
posted on
04/01/2002 8:58:20 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
with the more selective university. Either that or the area with the most blacks.
To: Dan from Michigan
Iowa is rather short on the latter. Cheers.
47
posted on
04/01/2002 9:07:01 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
All of them.
Might take me awhile to remember them all...but eventually I would get em.
The people's Republic of Johnson County is by far the most liberal (It is the home of Iowa U)...Sioux County, in Northwest Iowa, is by far the most conservative. Something like 92% of the registered voters are R)s...it's the churchgoing Dutch Reformed heritage, you know.
You are so funny.
To: Torie
There is a huge Dutch Reformed connection to Sioux Co. Iowa, Pella, Iowa, and the Grand Rapids, MI area...Holland, MI., Zeeland, New Holland, Hudsonville, et al...
My wife is Dutch (even had Vander in front of her maiden name ;-)...she grew up and went to school in Sioux Center Iowa, and her grandparents lived their whole lives in the predominately Dutch area you describe in Michigan.
To: nonliberal
I lost respect for Howard Philips the last election. I realized his running was about him--not the cause. He ran against GW, not Gore. GW may not be perfect but he's better than Gore. You would never have known it from listening to Phillips (and Buchanan's) ads.
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Running against GW was running against Gore. The two were carbon copies of each other.
To: Dan from Michigan
Story County (Ames) is split fairly evenly now. That is just in registrations though. I live in Ames and the place is crawling with RINOs.
To: nonliberal
Nonliberal: Don't you think you have unrealistic expectations of people? I agree with your desire to elect to office those who agree with our principles.
I've had to accept the fact we are all humans with weaknesses. We have to take the best we can get.
I'll work like heck for Salier but I guess if he loses, I'll have to vote for Ganske because he's still better than Harkin.
I admit I'm disappointed in Bush but to say there's no difference between Bush and Gore is ridiculous.
How would you like to have Gore protecting your rearend right now from terrorists? I'll take Bush, thank you.
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
I agree that Bush is conducting the war better than Gore would. On domestic policy though, they were virtually identical.
Keep in mind that Bush barely won this election. Had he been a conservative, he would have blown Gore out of the water.
To: nonliberal
On domestic policy though, they were virtually identical.Nonsense. How many tax cuts do you think Gore would give you? How many pro-life judges do you think he would nominate? How many judges that care anything at all about the Constitution, would Gore nominate? Just the corruption alone was reason enough not to vote for Gore. There's no hint of that type of corruption surrounding Bush.
How many military secrets do you think Bush is willing to sell to foreign countries in exchange for campaign contributions?
You just go ahead and vote for Gore (or whatever Dem gets the next nomination), I'll stick with Bush.
I also haven't heard of any political enemies of Bush being terrorized by IRS, etc.
No difference?
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Both favored PNTR with China
Both favored expanding the Department of Education
Both favored involving the United States in civil wars that are none of our business
Both favored CFR
Both favored open borders
Both favored a Patient's Bill of rights and prescription drug coverage under Medicare even though the power to enact such legislation is nowhere in the Constitution.
Both favored continuing Medicare and Social Security even though they are Democratic vote-buying scams
Both favored continuing foreign aid
Bush has not introduced partial birth abortion legislation even though he has the votes. Gore would not have introduced such legislation either.
Gore would have fought for his nominees
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson