Posted on 10/30/2019 4:08:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Yeah. Opposin' Hillary ain't, you know, healthy. Get my drift?
Gabbard can see she is being intentionally screwed by her own party.
I wouldn’t blame her if she ran independent.
Wouldn’t hurt President Trump.
Go Tulsi.
“She seems like a nice lady—be a shame is something happened to her.”
Hillary
(I love making up narratives like this. Can I be the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee someday?)
As Biden fades, it is possible for Gabbard to win Iowa.
Nobody has cast a vote yet, anything can happen.
Everybody thought Howard Dean was going to nominated until “The Scream”.
No way Tulsi will be the Democrat nominee. But she can run as a third-party Green candidate and guarantee that Trump is relected. Would she want to be a spoiler for Trump?
asking for Arkanside?
Bloomberg/Gabbard as a third party. It would be a Trump dream if it happened. Political trends change fast. After the Stalinist impeachment ultimately fails, the voters will look to punish the vulnerable Democrats. Bloomberg will see it as his chance to win as a third party and will seize the opportunity.
Well, she never did directly deny she was a Russian agent .../s
What if she already is, with a promise of an administration post after the election?
I know. That’s not what is going on, but the thought of President Trump going to that level of manipulation to mess with the Dems fills me with happiness. :)
Run, Tulsi. Run!
Bernie should run third-party, too - just to liven things up.
Tulsi is a kook. But she knows Kamala is a fraud, so the enemy of my enemy...
Bloomberg will never run third party because he hates Trump and wouldn’t want to hurt the Dem nominee. He has said as much.
She wants her own $600,000 house on the lake like Bernie got.
OH, heck, not a single vote has been cast, and she is also carving out be papabile for the VP nom or a serious 2024 run.
Green candidate would cripple her future prospects, as sopport for green fascism has peaked.
I do believe that she could carve a niche for herself as the leader of a new socialist antiwar faction, now that the Democrat party has been goaded into ceding the antiwar torch entirely to Trump.
Her tiff with Hitlery could launch such a moment strongly, although the old guard will always hate her for finishing Hillary off once and for all time.
Clinton calling Gabbard a Russian asset actually proves to liberals that it is a generic smear - that the DNC calls EVERYONE that.
A side benefit of Gabbard’s experiences is that it proves Big Tech tears down everyone who doesn’t align with liberals in power. For example, the coordinated media campaign against her AND her ads being refused by Big Tech.
If a DNC rep and Presidential candidate can be subject to a coordinated press smear campaign AND Big Tech censorship, it proves Trump is right - that they DO do this.
This very same numnuts said the same about Donald Trump in 2016...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.