[2ndDivisionVet]

So, in essence, we elected Donald Trump then?

[norwaypinesavage]

Note how the article blames the "posting" of the documents, rather than the "content" of the documents. Thus, it's WikiLeaks's fault for making them public, not Clinton's fault for causing them in the first place. The article also states that Trump supporters use "less reliable" sources. The reliability of the source is an opinion, not a fact.

This is more Fake News.

[Maverick68]

Here’s the Wikileaks scandal in a nutshell: The leaks simply exposed what a piece of zhit Hillary Clinton and her people were in a way that couldn’t be spun or ignored by the Media, period, end of story.

[spintreebob]

No more Bush! No more Clinton!

That was the universal theme on the internet long before Wikileaks or Trump appeared.

Jeb and Hillary each had an up hill climb to overcome that negative. Neither one succeeded.

Wikileaks just confirmed, again, what everyone already knew about Hillary. It didn’t change anyone’s mind.

The way Hillary conducted her campaign also did not change anyone’s mind. Consider: If Axelrod had run Hillary’s campaign rather than Podesta and if Hillary had listened to Axelrod’s advice, it is possible Hillary could have re-invented herself.

Compare I’m with her, Hillary’s slogan of self-important arrogance, with Trump’s MAGA. That slogan alone doomed Hillary from changing her image.

Trump also had high negatives. The difference between Hillary and Trump is that Trump and his team were smarter than Hillary and her team.

[RatRipper]

So . . . what about the value of a Mainstream Media completely in the tank for Hillary. MSM, OK; Wikileaks, a felonious outrage.

This garbage makes me puke buckshot.

[maxwellsmart_agent]

Trump would have won even if there was no Wikileaks.