Posted on 01/23/2017 3:06:43 PM PST by LS
No, there aren’t. There are more pressing things TO DO.
You’re still not getting it. Talking about x while DOING y keeps the Alinskyite focus off of Y and onto x.
________________
You 100% nailed it Larry.
The firetruck showed up to the house after it burned down because they went to the wrong address, again.
Too late boys!
Yeah, they’re dying. But, for now , network/cable are the main source of news and control the public square.
They’re all desperate, and desperately fighting to make more/lose less by providing their advertisers with the most of the most-desired demographics.
They’re very vulnerable, financially, to Trump’s supporters’ disgust. We’re not their most desirable demographic but their situation is so precarious that the loss of any audience is frightening.
Slim and Jeff are not trying to revive the Us/National Gazette model IMO, but seeking a ‘...publication with a strong relationship to its community ... “These have the ability to harvest a diversity of revenues, and these are places like National Geographic, The Atlantic, The New Yorker and little places like us,...”
“ “http://technical.ly/brooklyn/2017/01/24/david-plotz-atlas-obscura-business-model/?utm_content=bufferd1c1a&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Not clear that model can work on a large scale though.
IMO the best model for the political news business is that of POLITICO, The Hill, etc.: sell the reporting to the lobbying industry, let some lesser pearls fall to the peasants for free for PR (though they have been too partisan).
I would say that their influence and “control of the public square” is weak and fading fast. You see it with the fact that no one under 40 watches “the news” anymore, and idiots like Jon Stewart and Colbert are now old, tired, has beens.
Don’t look at what Slim/Bezos say. Look at where they are getting their support—100% from the Dem Party. I bet the kickbacks in various contracts are mind boggling. We are indeed back to the 1830s.
The quote isn’t from or about them- just described what I’d gathered about their plans from reports. (I don’t recommend the source article, just had to give credit).
On close examination it does describe a model similar to that of a partisan newspaper, with “a diversity of revenues”.
IF they both try to be the ‘National Democrat Newspaper’, they’ll be fighting each other: a pleasant thought.
LS I agree with your assessment ENTIRELY!!! GREAT JOB!!!
Bump
Nah, Larry S. is willing to do all this for his own delicious patriotic fervor! GTH, Harry Larry!
At Gettysburg Lee spent a day marching his troops past an opening in a tree line that the Union spies watched. The Union spies thought it must be the largest army ever assembled. Only, they didn’t realize that the troops marching by were actually the same small band over and over and over.
That happened at Chancellorsville, not Gettysburg.
Are you sure he didn’t do it twice?
Jackson was dead and he didn’t another corp commander that could pull that off again. That was a once in a war trick.
Well, if you are correct, all I can say is he should have done it again at Gettysburg.
The only thing that comes close in “ballsiness” was when Lee sent Longstreet’s entire corp to Tennessee by rail in four days just before the battle of Chicamauga Creek. What a shock that must have been to the Union command.
Sorry Georgia not Tennessee.
"During the American Civil War, Confederate General John B. Magruder faced off against Union General George B. McClellan at the Siege of Yorktown. Magruder and the confederate forces were outnumbered by an estimated 4 to 1. In order to overcome the Union forces, Magruder marched his troops in a repetitive back-and-forth in an effort to convince Union scouts that the Confederate force was larger than it appeared. The Union was deceived, and halted the assault instead of pushing its advantage. This allowed Magruder time to reinforce his position, leading what would have been a certain Union victory to an inconclusive finish."
And several other incidents of deception practiced during the Civil War here:
http://www.historynet.com/hoodwinked-during-americas-civl-war-confederate-military-deception.html
2,000 years ago, in his famous treatise The Art of War, Sun Tzu wrote, “All warfare is based on deception."
You have to admit it would be good strategery.
Yes, and I think that is why Bannon and the rest of the campaign kept talking with Larry Schweikart. Captains in the field are the natural extension of the General in the tower.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.