Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin talks about Trump’s Iowa loss and whether they’ve discussed running together
Yahoo! Politics ^
| February 2, 2016
| Hunter Walker, national correspondent
Posted on 02/02/2016 6:25:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: Finalapproach29er; 2ndDivisionVet
Cruz,Santorum,Huckabee,Pat Robertson....
See a pattern?
Everything Trump fan-bois were saying before Iowa was proven wrong. Why would I, or anyone else, listen to you now?
21
posted on
02/02/2016 6:45:28 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Finalapproach29er
You forgot Dubya, Obama and Carter, didn’t you? Why would that be?
Comment #23 Removed by Moderator
To: Finalapproach29er
;)
Winning Iowa is the kiss of death for a non-encumbent.
To: SamAdams76
Right. Great turnout which bodes well. But no correlation between Trump crowds and winning. Which I tried to argue to many here to no avail pre primary. So Trumps crowd in NH has absolutely nothing to do with Iowa and can be used as a tool to measure success. Bernie’s crowds dwarfef the witch and they tied. No correlation there either.
25
posted on
02/02/2016 6:49:30 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
Cruz won because Iowa voters did not buy New York values. That's the story that everybody missed.
I think you are wrong. cruz only won because of sleazy dirty trix. That is the only label that will stick after Iowa.
26
posted on
02/02/2016 6:49:52 PM PST
by
JoSixChip
(Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
To: Finalapproach29er
Pattern is:
If rest of American does not follow Iowa’s lead, Republican’s lose general election.
Bush
Huckabee
Santorum
When Bush won Iowa and nomination, he won general
When Huck and Santorum won Iowa, McCain and Romney lost general.
We should all get behind Iowa winner Cruz
27
posted on
02/02/2016 6:50:26 PM PST
by
NoDRodee
(U>S>M>C)
To: Disestablishmentarian
I like Sara Palin but the fact that she left office early makes her only good aa a cabinet member and endorsement.
I think as a vice president candidate she has lost luster as far as bringing in votes witch is the reason for naming some one a vice president.
to regain the presidential luster she needs to hold public office as governor or as a senator for eight years.
28
posted on
02/02/2016 6:52:29 PM PST
by
PCPOET7
To: jwalsh07
I don’t know. I think there were three winners last night. Cruz, Trump and Rubio. They are in a virtual three-way tie on delegates. Had this been winner-take-all, then I agree that Cruz would have won and Trump would have lost. But I’m not feeling too comfortable if I am a Cruz or a Trump supporters. Rubio is now right up there with both of them.
29
posted on
02/02/2016 6:52:43 PM PST
by
SamAdams76
(Delegates So Far: Cruz (8); Trump (7); Rubio (7)
To: JoSixChip
Right Jo. Your analysis pre primary was every bit as accurate as post primary. That being not accurate at all. You know in the old days here at FR there were people I disagreed with politically who had good intellects and an ability to see things as they are and put forth accurate and astute analysis.
Those days are over.
30
posted on
02/02/2016 6:54:11 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: 2ndDivisionVet
T.Rump seems to have surrounded himself with losers: John McCain, Sarah Palin, Scott Brown, Bob Dole, etc. Has anyone who has won his or her last election endorsed His Pompousness?
To: SamAdams76
Depends how you look at it. I see three outsiders getting about 60% of the vote. I like that and my prediction last week was the top three would basically get the same amount of delegates.
But Rubio should be taken seriously. He is a smart, personable guy who could break some of that 60% up.
32
posted on
02/02/2016 6:58:08 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Trump handlers got to go figure out now if she was a plus or minus in Iowa.
I think she was a plus but, he still came in second.
33
posted on
02/02/2016 6:58:16 PM PST
by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Finalapproach29er
You forgot Dubya, Obama and Carter, didnât you? Why would that be?
What, no reply?
How so very, unexpected!
34
posted on
02/02/2016 6:58:56 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: jwalsh07
You know in the old days here at FR there were people I disagreed with politically who had good intellects and an ability to see things as they are and put forth accurate and astute analysis.
You mean like this gem you posted earlier
Trump is dropping out. Vote Cruz
Save your holier then thou BS for someone who doesn't know just who and what you are.
35
posted on
02/02/2016 6:59:29 PM PST
by
JoSixChip
(Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
To: JoSixChip; jwalsh07
I think you are wrong. cruz only won because of sleazy dirty trix. That is the only label that will stick after Iowa.
Only in the fevered-mind of a TRUMP(PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME!) fan-boi.
36
posted on
02/02/2016 7:00:43 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Only in the fevered-mind of a TRUMP(PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME!) fan-boi.
Enjoy your time in the sun, or should I say rubio's shadow being as he is the one getting all the good pres coming out of Iowa. NH will be here soon enough.
37
posted on
02/02/2016 7:06:24 PM PST
by
JoSixChip
(Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - losers are not winners)
To: JoSixChip
Enjoy your time in the sun, or should I say rubio's shadow being as he is the one getting all the good pres coming out of Iowa. NH will be here soon enough.
Oh I am, trust me.
And whether Cruz wins another primary or not, Donald TRUMP (PRAISE BE TO HIS NAME!) will still NOT be a conservative and will still be unworthy of the votes of conservatives.
38
posted on
02/02/2016 7:08:09 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SamAdams76
Right, and if Trump and Cruz continue to split votes, then Rubio sails ahead. We can’t let that happen.
39
posted on
02/02/2016 7:08:53 PM PST
by
Catsrus
(I callz 'em as I seez 'em)
To: MIchaelTArchangel
It will be fun to watch his pompousness with the lib press at the WH
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson