Is Sarah Palin serious about 2016

The Daily Iowan | April 28, 2014 | Cassidy Riley

[Resettozero]

Moderator... Please?

What?

[Grams A]

Agree and on occasion some of them show up on FR.

[dforest]

LOL, came back to haunt ya.

[Resettozero]

But this was mean and just plain dumb, and I certainly wouldn’t even consider voting for her now.

Certainly! Why should you? I wouldn't if I were you.

[Peter ODonnell]

My belief is, the nomination is there if she wants it. I’m not sure why she backed away from 2012 because it was probably the same thing then. I hope she takes the opportunity because I honestly don’t think any other candidate could win in 2016 nor if they did, would they be able to fix the mess. I’m not even sure Palin can fix the mess, and the world could be a far more chaotic place by early 2017 than it is today.

As to this waterboarding remark, it’s understandable. The sane people of this world have had it up to the eyeballs with the barbaric mindless killing spree of the Islamists, and exasperation is understandable. Most voters are probably not looking for Utopian enlightenment towards terrorists at this point. We could get that in spades from the current administration, but who needs it?

[deport]

Comments?

Palin’s forte is best used from a non elective position.

[HMS Surprise]

I guess you won’t go away... Name the Republican nominee who won’t be vilified by the MSM? Remember how they lived McCain? Was Reagan loved by the MSM? Romney faired well too, didn’t he? Omg, the lunacy on FR is staggering.

[COBOL2Java]

You are exactly right on the money! Matter of fact, the GOPe agrees totally with you: she never could win now. Never. Not not never but never never never not now. No.

Hee! 9 out of 10 PDS sufferers agree: Karl's whiteboard knows all, sees all! ;-)

[2ndDivisionVet]

"Did Palin ever explain why she endorsed McCain in 2010? I don’t remember reading that."

Could someone else explain that? I tire of it.

[Dr. Sivana]

Other than Cruz, who hasn’t announced yet, please list this stellar crowd.

Ted Cruz
Scott Walker
Mike Pence


All three can be held as better candidates than Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum.

Walker is the one man who has been every bit as vetted as Sarah Palin. He has also won TWO statewide elections in under three years and is about to win his third. Like Palin, he makes the lefties' heads explode and makes their mouths froth. Pence is solid and has been in both congress and is a sitting governor. He also knows how to handle the media.

I would happily support Palin, but wish she made a go of it last time as she had the publicity and the momentum and could have done well in a lot of the primaries against a Romney. But she didn't run, which is her business. If she is NOT going to run, I would love for her to reserve a third party line as an emergency escape hatch against an uper RINO (Bush/Romney/Christie, maybe R. Paul the way he's been talking)

I don't buy into the idea that we need a woman to run against a witch. There are plenty of women who will vote for a Cruz or a Pence. Plenty of women will re-elect Scott Walker this year despite his opponent being a woman.

[sauropod]

Hope she’s serious.

[9YearLurker]

Why a minority man? Not a white woman?

[Resettozero]

LOL, came back to haunt ya.

Huh? Oh this? Or do you mean...you?

[sauropod]

Are you effin’ serious?

[Georgia Girl 2]

Palin was not serious about running in 2012 and she’s not serious for 2016. She ought to run for the House or Senate from Alaska. She would do a good job.

IMO if we get a republican president in 2016 they should make her Secretary of Energy. She actually is incredibly knowledgeable about it.

[HMS Surprise]

I would offer that Palin is targeted precisely because the Left fears what she would do if she ever took the reins of power. It is why I support her. Heads... Will... Roll.

[2ndDivisionVet]

[sauropod]

I hadn’t heard that.

Name someone else that has espoused the conservative point of view the way she has.

I’m waiting....

[PGalt]

GO Sarah!

[dforest]

I was just kind of teasin’ you. You were being facetious.