[SMGFan]

I have the benefit of waiting until June to vote . The states voting in February should not decide the candidate.

[nfldgirl]

In SC...#1 PALIN (assuning she enters the race); #2 CAIN

[upchuck]

I’m in South Carolina and for Sarah 100%. Assuming she announces before the SC primary :)

Seriously, I’m for Cain right now with the right to switch to Sarah when she announces.

[El Cid]

California.
My vote won't matter.
Nonetheless, Palin and Cain are my top two choices, with Bachmann a step down at number three.

[behzinlea]

I have my preferences (which are still subject to change at this point). However, regardless of who it ends up being, I WILL vote for the Republican nominee against Obama--with vigor and with great satisfaction.

Hell yeah.

[FLFisher]

Florida=Cain

[ALASKA]

Texan/Alaskan: Against Perry, FOR Palin.

[Little Ray]

“Not Mitt Romney” works for me.

[roamer_1]

MT here - and I am decided - None of the Above. None of the declared or undeclared candidates are conservative, and thereby are unworthy of my vote.

[DefeatCorruption]

Here in Florida...ANYONE but Obama.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I am “multiply-decided”, but it is indistinguishable from “undecided”. So far, I find the following candidates more or less acceptable: Bachmann, Cain, Perry, Santorum.

I would be dissappointed with Gingrich. I say no to Romney and Huntsman.

I’m “waiting” for Sarah Palin, but not expectantly — I have no idea if she will run, and it’s not going to bother me if she doesn’t.

Soon I’ll have to decide which candidates to collect signatures for. It will probably be the 4 I mentioned above. By the time I have to vote, my guess is the choice will be clear.

I was close to choosing Perry, but he’s been quite underwhelming. I’m not turned off by most of the silly attacks on him, but his big selling point was his ability to bring the party together, and we’ve seen that this is an easy thing for other candidates to destroy.

I still think he is the most solid candidate for my top three issues, and also he is the best 10th-amendment candidate we have. His writings on that subject are clear, and he has talked the talk and walked the walk on state rights issues for years.

But none of that matters if he can’t draw a solid electorate with him.

Cain seems good enough, but I still think he’s unelectable. Also, I see the anti-other-candidate lobby has started to trash him here now. And they are very good at what they do — see how they destroyed Bachmann when she was shooting up in the polls?

[Revolting cat!]

"I am from New Jersey"

Sorry, but that in itself says more than you'll ever want to tell us.

[Revolting cat!]

I've been everywhere, man, (including Joysee), and Ifear today that we're going to get this pair:

[Revolting cat!]

Hooze undee-sided?

[Revolting cat!]

Ki[e]nski / Palinski 2012 !

[OKIEDOC]

Today on local radio here in North Central Arizona, several Tea Party callers to the station touted Herman Cain as being a respectable candidate. The moderator also seemed to be leaning toward Cain. Is Cain’s grassroots candidacy about to take off in a big way?

Still undecided but leaning a little......

[roxtar221]

I’m still hoping Palin will get in the game. As far as VP, I’d like to see Col West in that spot.