Does Sarah Palin have a shot at U.S. presidency?

Xinhua ^ | December 21, 2010 | Matthew Rusling

[t-dude]

You are really very sadly mistaken.

I wonder what level of ignorance you must be at to come up with your bullsh*t. Yor derangement is probably the worst I’ve seen on here, you can’t even think straight.LOL

I have asked NO one for “proof” of anything.
(so, you are lying about what I said.)

I was asking for REASONS why they held the views they did.

No one has “proof’ of anything that is going to happen in the 2012 election. Are you twelve yeas old? Or just mentally slow?

Poll after poll does NOT show Americans disagree with Palin on the issues. The polls you are confused about are probably ones asking about her electability (and they are bogus/slanted/biased.)

Here is what I was talking about, you mental midget:

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5811152/more_voters_agree_with_sarah_palin.html?cat=9

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/september_2010/52_of_voters_say_their_views_are_more_like_palin_s_than_obama_s

[mad_as_he$$]

Palin must be so proud to have name calling, ad hominem attacking people like you representing her on FR.

[t-dude]

I get a little upset (mad_as_he$$?) when people twist my words and lie about what I say. (huh, just like they do with Governor Palin...what is it about her detractors that they can’t discuss issues honestly? ...oh yeah, they have NOTHING to stand on)

I don’t mind an honest debate.

You weren’t worth the emotion. My point stands.

My apologies for offending your delicate sensibilities.

[mad_as_he$$]

I did not lie about what you said. Below is your post I responded to. Learn some English.

To: freedumb2003

Hey freeDumb,

I want to thank you.

I don’t really know what your motives or intentions are by coming on here with your anti-Palin nonsense, but it has provided a valuable service here and I appreciate it.

I guess you may be unfamiliar with or just don’t understand the phenomenon of Sarah, but she connects with her supporters on such an elementary gut level, we feel she is actually one of us and represents our core values.

We tend to see all the unfair and false criticisms of her as attacks on us and what we personally believe in and hold dear. As such, when someone like you comes along spouting the usual mainstream narrative (that we know for a fact to be false) it strengthens our resolve, causing us to get even more invested in her victory.

You may single handily inspire enough of us to put her over the top early.

So, please, keep up the good work.

You have given no evidence to support your “position” that Sarah can’t win. You only repeat the establishment lie based on bogus polls. They are trying to sway public opinion with these, and it must be frustrating for you establishment types that it doesn’t seem to be working.

I have to ask, is Romney paying you? Because if not you are a fool. He is paying good money for agitators like you in an attempt to tamp down support for Sarah.

It’s just ironic how it has the opposite effect.

So thank you...now go get some of that easy Romney money. Fool.

167 posted on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 08:04:43 by t-dude (Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ev·i·dence   /ˈɛvɪdÉ™ns/ Show Spelled [ev-i-duhns] Show IPA noun, verb, -denced, -denc·ing. –noun 1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.

2. something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign: His flushed look was visible evidence of his fever.

3. Law . data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects.

Evidence=PROOF.

You asked Freedumb for "evidence" I asked you for your "proof".

Remember you started the name calling.

BTW No jerk off internet keyboard jackwagon like you can offend me. You clearly have been drinking the Kool-aid.

If you want to have a discussion do not call me a name again. Please try to keep up.

If you are not willing to recognize your own posts then this will be short.

I'll wager I have forgotten more about politics than you know. I worked on two of Reagan's Presidential campaigns. Three different US Senate candidates and two House Reps - one of which is serving today.

[death2tyrants]

I worked on two of Reagan's Presidential campaigns.

And here you are, on a pro-Palin website, flaming her supporters. When did your fall from grace begin?

[t-dude]

Well now I am sorry.

Since I was asking for something that would support freeDumb’s position, when I used the word “evidence” I was using it with the understood meaning of :

(from your definition)
1. grounds for belief;

2. something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign

(these definitions are understood by most with standard reading comprehension when used as I did: asking for “evidence’ to support his position)

Yes, evidence CAN BE proof, but NOT always.

Proof is always evidence, i.e. the evidence that proves the facts. But evidence is not always proof, sometimes it’s an indication or a sign or (and this is key, pay attention) “grounds for belief.” That’s why words matter. Hence the reason I DIDN’T use the word “proof.”

I know what I am saying. My English is just fine thank you.

No, “proof” was your word. Perhaps you should look that up if you’re still at the stage that you have to look up the meaning of simple words. That might not help you with comprehension in proper usage...hmmm...maybe some remedial reading classes?

Thanks for the admonition to “learn some English” but please, look in a freakin’ mirror.

I am surprised President Reagan had such a poorly educated person working for him...perhaps your job was knocking on doors or handing out fliers? Congratulations.

Yes, I lost my composure when I thought you were unfairly characterizing my position.

Now I see you are just confused.

My apologies again.

You have a wonderful evening and please don’t hurt yourself out there. It’s a big dangerous world, especially for people like you who struggle with the simple things.

[mad_as_he$$]

I am not flaming anybody. I simply asked a question and was insulted and belittled by your high and mighty Palinista mafia.

[death2tyrants]

You’re not very good at playing the victim.

[mad_as_he$$]

You are not very good at reviewing the record.

I DID NOT start the name calling.

[mad_as_he$$]

You are not very good at reviewing the record.

I DID NOT start the name calling.

[mad_as_he$$]

You are not very good at reviewing the record.

I DID NOT start the name calling.