The Progressive? ‘Nuff said...
Still don’t see how this wave could ‘take our democracy with it’
O’Donnell is aising $2,500 a minute right now. See the link on Drudge. She started with a 50k goal. Now she’s 93% of the way to 500,000. There are 700,000 voters in Delaware in total. The RNSC got scared (of us basically) and gave her $47,000 earlier in the day as well. :P
Dem Dems is in troubles.
That's right.
Just 11%.
Libturds still haven't figured out that they live in a Republic.
U.S. Constitution Article 4 - The States Section 4 - Republican Government The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,...
All this does is give Coons a CHANCE to win, when he had NO chance before. He is not guaranteed anything...not in this climate. People see that others feel the same as they do, and they are responding exponentially...
(((PING)))
God Almighty - Planters jokes? I haven’t heard those since George Jessel died.
If pundits are right and democrats have a disastrous November 2nd, the lib rags will be a SCREAM to read!!!
“she’s on record saying condoms don’t prevent AIDS,”
So if I put a condom on my winky then shoot heroin into my eyeball using a needle I found on the floor or a junkie crack house, I’m not at risk for AIDS?
cool beans!
If there was an award for tired lame jokes...
Let's see if we can help the liberal out on this one (and anyone with a probabilities background is welcome to join in).
According to planed parent hood, a condom is 90% effective at preventing pregnancy.
A woman can only become pregnant approximately 6 days out of every month.
That means a condom only has to work 20% of the time, and during that time, it is only successful 90% of the time.
AIDS is transmissible 100% of the time. My statistics and probabilities haven't been used since college, but I put a condom at about 18% successful at preventing AIDS.
Hardly a ringing endorsement, but it hasn't stopped the government from spending millions to promote “safe” sex!
And this is from Obama's CDC.
LOL...remember when Sarah quit her governorship and all the “experts” in both parties said that was the end of her influence in politics? Yes, they are proving that they can be wrong all the time.
Mayby so--but the nuts of the Tea Party are nothing compared to the hate-filled, bigotted, greedy, intolerant, un-liberal, America-hating psychos who make up the Leftist Freakshow.
“She’s on record saying condoms don’t prevent AIDS, that AIDS victims shouldn’t be called “victims,” and that masturbation is bad, bad, bad.”
What planet do these people live on? Condoms might retard the spread of AIDS, but they don’t prevent it. AIDS-infectees, with the exception of people like those who got it long ago from blood transfusions, are not “victims”, any more than people who get herpes are “Herpes victims”. As for masturbation, last time I checked, it was still considered a moral indiscretion by almost everyone, even if it’s a commonplace one. If there’s nothing wrong with it, we wouldn’t sneak off to the bathroom or wherever to do it :P
I sure as hell hope so, we need to restore a constitutional Republic.
If you are a lawyer, and the person that you wish to discredit is female, employment of the "Nuts and Sluts" strategy has some success with juries. It is a chavenistic technique to discredit the female opposition without actually having to address relevant issues related to credibility. First provide some irregularity in the female opponents history; it doesn't have to be related to the present. Then find a sexual irregularity, no matter how trivial. The jury will then draw their own conclusions.
Read what this guy wrote again. He even gets it in the right order. First a paragraph about nuts, then sex.
It's rather vapid when you know the motive.