Posted on 02/19/2010 2:47:52 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
McCain won the Republican nomination fair and square. Bush before him, Dole before that, etc. etc., etc. You get my point.
Thank you! You made my day.
McCain didn’t win the Republican nomination fair and square, because the primary process is neither fair nor square. Wake up.
Prove it! Each state is allowed to set their own parties’ nomination process. If you believe anyone in any state violated the law, make a claim.
NONE of the other candidates were in essentials any different than voting for a Democrat, and I was NOT going to nominate a Democrat to a Republican primary. There was nothing fair nor square about that. Just because each state is allowed to set the nomination process, and many states allow Democrates to vote in those primaries, it by no means follows that it is either fair or square. The process is broken.
Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's moral; surely you know that. So just because the primary nomination process is the way it is, doesn't mean it's fair or square. IT ISN'T, and the proof was in McCain ending up as the nominee.
We’re talking about elections, not morality. If you don’t like how the Republican party does things in CA, then talk with the RNC in CA and make a change.
http://www.calvoter.org/voter/elections/2008/primary/president/index.html#repub
According to the above link he was on the ballot. Why did you write him in?
My conscience would never allow me to not vote for the person who I felt would make the best President.
Well next time you will vote for Romney, because that is where you train is leading. Keep attacking Palin Romney-bot. And don’t comeback saying you don’t support Romney, because everyone knows that Palin is the only one out there capable of flattening the wheels on the Romney bus.
And it is all, always, a gamble. You invest your vote the same way you invest your money: in the hopes that you're making the right long-term decision.
I am mindful of Einstein's definintion of insanity, of doing the same thing over and and over and expecting to get a different result. I have been voting a certain way over and over for more than 30 years, that "lesser of two evils" thing, always hoping for different results, and they always come out the same: the Republican party becomes more and more Democrat Lite. Government continues to grow, freedoms continue to be encroached, by the very party I HOPE will go the opposite direction. Yet I have been the one to vote for Republicans who have taken it in that opposite direction on the flawed premise (I now understand) that they were the lesser of two evils.
There is only ONE WAY for the Republican party to become less Liberal, and that is for liberal Republican candidates TO LOSE. From now on, that is how I will vote. I invite all Republicans who want to see a return to limited government conservatism to join me.
"Conscience" has nothing to do with it -- it's entirely self-interest. I want the government off my neck and back in the servants quarters where it belongs. For each of us, our vote is our each individual oar in the water, our each individual hand on the sails, to change the direction of the ship that's about to founder on Liberal shoals. I KNOW that now, and I understand that the ONLY way I can make the ship change course, is to cast my vote such that Liberal Republicans lose, and limited government conservative Republicans win. Period.
No,I never said I was a Republican,so I`ll vote third party before I vote for a Republicrat.
Ok.Discussion ended.Bye bye people.
Nomad is a fraud. Don’t get a headache trying to convince staunch Palin detractors that Sarah is a true conservative. There are two types of people on here now Romney supporters and Palin supporters. Don’t trust what anyone says just judge by their actions and by where their actions will lead.
My bad you will vote for Obama by default.
So when we get another Pres. William Clinton we can blame you.
I heard a rumor that Ralph Nader was thinking of running in 2012, I guess he’s your man.
This whole Tea Party thing is starting to look like an Alinsky style trick in order to blow away any hopes of a conservative resurgence. The self-righteous (Palin endorsed McCain) pukes want to destroy any hope of a Republican winning in 2012. In stead of the Tea Party allowing conservatism to flush out the Republican Party the Tea Party is being used to destroy a good person like Sarah Palin.
Romney has a right to run in 2012. He wasn’t my guy in 2008, so unless someone else is on the primary ballot in AZ in 2012, I’d probably vote someone else.
BTW, there were around 20 people on the 2008 AZ Republican primary ballot in AZ. Its no wonder why McCain didn’t get a majority in his own State.
Good call on the Nader comment :-)
Romney has a right to run, and I don’t think anyone here is disputing that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.