Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Southerners looking to share their Confederate holiday
Hartford Courant ^ | March 22, 2009 | Dahleen Glanton

Posted on 03/21/2009 6:26:13 AM PDT by cowboyway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,221-1,235 next last
To: Non-Sequitur
Or are you saying that they decided to rebel just for the hell of it?

I can't speak for people who are all gone now, but if it were me, and I had a chance to break away from anal retentive people like you, I'd jump at it. Give me any excuse.

761 posted on 03/24/2009 8:04:01 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Rustabout
No over analysis there. Just insight.
Race stays in as it was over race and slavery the war was fought...or more accurately the money from race and slavery.
It also, if you note, plays into the popular fear of the North at the time at what a glut of now freed black labor would do. Several pasts posts deal with that issue of labor costs and job competition.
The fact that a few blacks fought for the South is what, your excuse to ignore the rest of the four million or so that were in bondage?
This is what the Neo’s can't address for there is no defense.
762 posted on 03/24/2009 8:05:18 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“The confederacy initiated the war when it fired on Sumter.”

It did so in self-defense. The Radicals wanted to destroy the South.


763 posted on 03/24/2009 8:13:10 AM PDT by ihatedemocrats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I can't speak for people who are all gone now, but if it were me, and I had a chance to break away from anal retentive people like you, I'd jump at it. Give me any excuse.

You apparently need no excuse at all. And you would have us believe that neither did the confederate leadership.

764 posted on 03/24/2009 8:14:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; central_va
"So will you at least admit that they wanted to leave in the first place to defend their institution of slavery against what they saw as the threat to it posed by the Lincoln election?"

Kudos for your triple strawman in one sentence!

Slavery wasn't an issue in the seccession, until northern newspaper editors needed an excuse to promote war. Taxation was the foundation of the Civil War. Congress was sucking agriculture dry to support big city cesspools. (sound familiar?)

Lincoln had no opinion WRT slavery, until he saw the power that lay therein.

765 posted on 03/24/2009 8:16:18 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You apparently need no excuse at all. And you would have us believe that neither did the confederate leadership

Yank, you are starting to get it.

766 posted on 03/24/2009 8:16:24 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861

I do get it. That’s the point.

The method used to free the slaves was not the Civil War. This is one of misdirections presented when attacking Lincoln (LDS).
The South seceded. Lincoln fought and stated the fight was to preserve the Union. He stated if keeping slavery was the cost he wouldn’t have ended it. That both takes away #1 and #2 as your disagreement. It is what revisionists today are using to impugn Lincoln. The black nationalists are using that argument too.
Lincoln did give a damn about slaves. He just knew the ugly choice he had to make. Once engaged in the struggle, though, there was no reason not to pursue freeing them. But he didn’t free the slaves in the border states. Why? You know why. He had to win the war. Back to that ugly choice. There are no inconsistencies there.

Yes I deplore slavery then, just as I do now. For it still exists.
As an institution slavery didn’t last in other countries because it didn’t survive economically, not because people suddenly got religion.
Here, it might have gone another way as slavery could have remained profitable with the turning of slaves to skilled labor as seen in the bigger cities.
Hence my past comparisons with illegal immigrant labor and the Chinese labor models.


767 posted on 03/24/2009 8:17:10 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 735 | View Replies]

To: ihatedemocrats
The Radicals wanted to destroy the South.

How so?

768 posted on 03/24/2009 8:17:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Slavery wasn't an issue in the seccession...

Then why was it the single most commonly mentioned reason for secession in all the Southern declarations of the causes of session and speeches by the confederate secession commissioners and political leadership?

Taxation was the foundation of the Civil War.

Then why did the South secede before taxes had been raised? Why didn't they secede the year before when the Morrill Tariff had first been introduced? Why did Lincoln's election set them off?

Lincoln had no opinion WRT slavery, until he saw the power that lay therein.

The question is what motivated the South to rebellion, not what motivated Lincoln to fight the war that the confederacy forced on him.

769 posted on 03/24/2009 8:22:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Yank, you are starting to get it.

Get rebellion for no reason at all? No, I don't think I do.

770 posted on 03/24/2009 8:23:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You apparently need no excuse at all.

Can't be said enough. Yell it from the roof tops, post it everywhere. Any state that wants to go it alone - Godspeed and may the Lord be with you.

771 posted on 03/24/2009 8:24:17 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Get rebellion for no reason at all? No, I don't think I do.

It's the states implied threat of seperatism that keeps the Feds in line. Just proves you are a Federal boot licking /expletive deleted/

772 posted on 03/24/2009 8:27:01 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: central_va
It's the states implied threat of seperatism that keeps the Feds in line.

And how's that working for you?

Just proves you are a Federal boot licking /expletive deleted/

And you're just the /expletive deleted/.

773 posted on 03/24/2009 8:29:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Not so well, I believe there is no chance for seperatism, you Federalist have pretty much won. Next step socialism. Thanks for winning the war.....


774 posted on 03/24/2009 8:32:08 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 773 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And you're just the /expletive deleted/.

You see, there's the rub. We are no different then our 19th century ancestors. The same bad blood is there, I just try to keep it under control. Can you?

775 posted on 03/24/2009 8:39:34 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 773 | View Replies]

To: central_va
The same bad blood is there, I just try to keep it under control

I'd say you're not having a lot of success in that area, given your ire towards all things Northern.

776 posted on 03/24/2009 8:44:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I'd say you're not having a lot of success in that area, given your ire towards all things Northern.

The Northerners are pulling us down a socialist toilet, you'll forgive me if I come up for air every now and then, won't you?

777 posted on 03/24/2009 8:48:33 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Considering the Federal Government always has their hands in the cookie jar, who do you think?


778 posted on 03/24/2009 8:51:46 AM PDT by Rustabout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies]

To: central_va
As my momma used to say, “You can not be truely educated if you let people do the thinking for you.” So, I guess I'm not a brainwashed Yank, Hippie, or Gangsta. LOL
779 posted on 03/24/2009 8:51:47 AM PDT by Rustabout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: Rustabout
Considering the Federal Government always has their hands in the cookie jar, who do you think?

So it is your contention that the federal government is forcing down wages in the South while allowing them to rise in the rest of the country?

780 posted on 03/24/2009 8:54:57 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800 ... 1,221-1,235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson