Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Born in the U.S.A.
FactCheck.org ^ | August 21, 2008 | Factcheck.org

Posted on 08/21/2008 4:45:25 PM PDT by Kevmo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
There are photos and electronic links embedded within the original article that can't be posted here... if someone else wants to do it they are welcome to do so.
1 posted on 08/21/2008 4:45:25 PM PDT by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Polarik; Calpernia; pissant

For your respective ping lists and/or attention.


2 posted on 08/21/2008 4:46:06 PM PDT by Kevmo (A person's a person, no matter how small. ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Factcheck bends over backwards to *help* Barack Hussein Obama, but I think the birth certificate on his official website and dailykos IS a fake, but I also think he was born in the USA - there’s something else he’s hiding.


3 posted on 08/21/2008 4:50:40 PM PDT by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

That really does pretty much settle the whole “it’s a forgery!” claim. Only people hanging onto that belief are the right’s version of 9-11 troofers...


4 posted on 08/21/2008 4:52:13 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Hey, if these particular facts are “pro-Obama,” then that’s just the way it is. From my experience, factcheck.org really is pretty non-partisan. If they’d have found facts that were “anti-Obaman,” they’d have published those.

IOW, “pro” or “anti” don’t change the facts...


5 posted on 08/21/2008 4:54:28 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Good catch, but the tinfoil hat crowd will pronounce everything as counterfeit, and end up chasing idiocy and diverting attention from the real issues of the campaign.

The real issue is that Obama’s plans would destroy America. Everything else is aluminum haberdashery.

6 posted on 08/21/2008 4:54:40 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Putting it out deflects attention from the adoption ceremony in which his new father had to renounce young Barry’s US citizenship as a precondition. Or so the story goes...


7 posted on 08/21/2008 4:55:55 PM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

America’s Right: Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court on Grounds he is Constitutionally Ineligible for the Presidency

Thursday, August 21, 2008
Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court on Grounds he is Constitutionally Ineligible for the Presidency
by Jeff Schreiber
America’s Right.com

A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.

Phillip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit—just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver—for the health of the Democratic Party.

“I filed this action at this time,” Berg stated, “to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.”.

Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator’s background, and in today’s lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a naturalized U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls “dual loyalties” due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia.

Even if Sen. Obama can prove his U.S. citizenship, Berg stated, citing the senator’s use of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii verified as a forgery by three independent document forensic experts, the issue of “multi-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegiance to other countries” remains on the table.

In the lawsuit, Berg states that Sen. Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the senator maintains. Before giving birth, according to the lawsuit, Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya with his father but was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy, “apparently a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight.” As Sen. Obama’s own paternal grandmother, half-brother and half-sister have also claimed, Berg maintains that Stanley Ann Dunham—Obama’s mother—gave birth to little Barack in Kenya and subsequently flew to Hawaii to register the birth.

Berg cites inconsistent accounts of Sen. Obama’s birth, including reports that he was born at two separate hospitals—Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital—in Honolulu, as well a profound lack of birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham, though simple “registry of birth” records for Barack Obama are available in a Hawaiian public records office.

Should Sen. Obama truly have been born in Kenya, Berg writes, the laws on the books at the time of his birth hold that U.S. citizenship may only pass to a child born overseas to a U.S. citizen parent and non-citizen parent if the former was at least 19 years of age. Sen. Obama’s mother was only 18 at the time. Therefore, because U.S. citizenship could not legally be passed on to him, Obama could not be registered as a “natural born” citizen and would therefore be ineligible to seek the presidency pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.

Moreover, even if Sen. Obama could have somehow been deemed “natural born,” that citizenship was lost in or around 1967 when he and his mother took up residency in Indonesia, where Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Berg also states that he possesses copies of Sen. Obama’s registration to Fransiskus Assisi School In Jakarta, Indonesia which clearly show that he was registered under the name “Barry Soetoro” and his citizenship listed as Indonesian.

The Hawaiian birth certificate, Berg says, is a forgery. In the suit, the attorney states that the birth certificate on record is a forgery, has been identified as such by three independent document forensic experts, and actually belonged to Maya Kasandra Soetoro, Sen. Obama’s half-sister.

“Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by Sen. Obama’s lies and obfuscations,” Berg stated. “If the DNC officers ... had performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship as prescribed by constitutional laws.”

“It is unfair to the country,” he continued, “for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question of the ability to serve if elected.”


8 posted on 08/21/2008 4:57:00 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Wow, the negative adjective laden text from Annenberg tells a story too. This is still a modified limited hangout. This “fact” is not about the whole truth. The inclusion of the Corsi quotes suggests who they are most upset at.

They do not address the reasonable concerns re the blanked out cert number, the use of “African” as a term, nor do they give a close of the names.

And why is the certificate so precious, that they could only come in to visit it while under escort? And why not allow some truly neutral party to view it? Exactly how much does Hawaii charge for a certified copy?

This “factcheck” resolves very little.


9 posted on 08/21/2008 4:57:05 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; Kevmo; SE Mom; Calpernia; Polarik

Still waiting for your pings to your threads discussing the real issues. Funny how it was after a trip to Hawaii that he has a nice stamp on the back with some dudes name and has a certificate number. I’m sure it was all a coincidence. Those darn Chicago politicians are trustworthy souls.


10 posted on 08/21/2008 4:57:34 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
Factcheck bends over backwards to *help* Barack Hussein Obama...

That's exactly what I thought when I read where they wrote, "We beg to differ."

I don't really have an opinion one way or the other. I just find it unusually bold for a "non-partisan" organization to use such strong, pointed language.
11 posted on 08/21/2008 4:58:50 PM PDT by coffee260 (coffee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
From TexasDarlin (texasdarlin.wordpress.com/) today:

"First, keep in mind: Senator Obama was the first Chairman of the Board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Division, or Project, of the Annenberg Foundation.

William (Bill) Ayres, unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist and a friend of the Obamas, was instrumental in founding the Challenge, thanks to his ties to Mayor Richard Daley. Daley was also a pal of Thomas Ayres, Bill’s father, former CEO of ComEd (owned by Exelon).

[Incidentally, the current CEO of ComEd, Frank M. Clark, is a major money bundler for the Obama campaign.]

Factcheck.org, used as a resource by so many who wish to “debunk” negative coverage of Obama, is also a Division, or Project, of the Annenberg Foundation.

You’ll recall that Factcheck was the second site to publish the now-suspect Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) reportedly received from the Obama campaign."

12 posted on 08/21/2008 4:58:55 PM PDT by christie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; Polarik

Simply amazing how the embossed stamp is so clear suddenly.


13 posted on 08/21/2008 4:59:06 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar
From my experience, factcheck.org really is pretty non-partisan.

Factcheck=Annenberg. I'll skip it.

14 posted on 08/21/2008 5:00:28 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: christie

Yup. Why didn’t big ears choose a non-related group to inspect his forgery?


15 posted on 08/21/2008 5:02:53 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

“there’s something else he’s hiding.” Gee, you think? ;)


16 posted on 08/21/2008 5:03:04 PM PDT by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: piytar
What is your experience? That gives you to say that the Annenberg FactCheck is non-partisan? Their emotionally laden and slandering adjectives in that non-biased article tell a different story.

You said it, now back it up.

17 posted on 08/21/2008 5:06:23 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

“Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator’s background, and in today’s lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a naturalized U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls “dual loyalties” due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia.”

From post above titled “Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court”


18 posted on 08/21/2008 5:07:03 PM PDT by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

And Obama just happened to have just a day ago returned from the Kingdom of Hawaii. That new cert is so clean and fresh!


19 posted on 08/21/2008 5:08:06 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Just who is factcheck.org anyway? A quick view of their website shows it is a collection of journalists, not forensics experts.
20 posted on 08/21/2008 5:15:19 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson