Posted on 08/26/2025 11:56:11 AM PDT by Freeleesy
“My $0.02 cents: This was a setup.”
Oh, I have little doubt. But the difference is that the girl was arrested and charged because she was unable to control herself to the point of threatening bodily damage. The article said she was forced to brandish the knife and the article appeared to say she was the one endangered or threatened. If what I waw on the videos was her being endangered then the only endangering she did was to herself. Coaxing someone into doing something stupid is not against the law. She broke it unless there is more. I’ve seen a few thug wannabe’s hurt for what she did.
And another point is she brought a knife and a hatchet to a non-existent fight. Next time she may find the other person is packing and all the tough talk in the world cannot deflect a bullet. Thugs get real subdued lying on the ground bleeding. And all she had to do was walk away like her friend tried to get her to do and almost pushed her into the street.
wy69
“...before she turns back to him, weapons ready.”
If you look at the last part of the video after she pulled out the weapons, she never put them away and after walking to her right on the sidewalk showing the weapons, she turned back to her left and started toward the migrant brandishing the weapons.
“I don’t know what the self-defense laws are in Scotland. But any reasonable person would attagirl her.”
A reasonable person wouldn’t be concealed carrying a knife and a hatchet to be pulled without provocation. That’s the main problem. If the migrant was using a weapon or was doing nothing more than filming the incident without rushing her or threatening her, then she broke the law.
A good site on carrying a knife in public might be here:
https://www.gov.uk/buying-carrying-knives
She wasn’t supposed to have them and did not provide evidence of why she would. Otherwise she wouldn’t have been arrested and charged.
wy69
She was backing away from the illegal and shouting at him to stay away, yet he continued to approach. Considering the rapes of young girls that are rampant in Britain, carrying some kind of protection seems prudent. And the possibility of getting shot is slim to none in Scotland.
I wonder about the scope of your experience with street violence.
Exhibit A is the rampant rapefugee problem in the UK. Exhibit B is the banning of guns in the UK. What else is she supposed to use to defend herself from rapefuges? Bagpipes?
Uncomfortable is the natural human state.
God made us that way.
Uncomfortable people take action to improve their state.
People that are too comfortable don't move and die.
The point is there are higher ups—administrators—causing the problems.
All the problems.
And it’s entirely possible to hold them accountable.
I agree with this. I think she did a great job making herself and her friend "hard targets".
Musk’s St. George’s Flag tweet is now over 60 million views...
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1960230222441193644
“A reasonable person wouldn’t be concealed carrying a knife and a hatchet to be pulled without provocation.”
There are two possible explanations for your low IQ statement above.
1. you don’t understand how disarming normal people is the first strategy of the global criminals
2. you’re working for the global criminals
I should add that those working for the global crime syndicate are not the only ones who don’t know the reason for their own motivations.
The same lack of insight is found in their employers.
Impressive
“And the possibility of getting shot is slim to none in Scotland.”
I quoted the law and it is supposed to be impossible for her to have a knife either. So your problem is with the law, not the outcome. She isn’t supposed to have the knife or the hatchet until she is a minimum of 17 years old and even then can provide a reason for having it. I don’t write their laws and it has nothing to do with US laws.
“She was backing away from the illegal...”
In the first part of the video she was being pushed away from the migrant screaming at him. Her friend ultimately grabbed her phone and walked away without any problem. You never saw the migrant so it is safe to say he never went after her for other than the filming. And at the last of the video she actually was going towards him with the knife brandished. You tell me which one was the threat.
wy69
“I wonder about the scope of your experience with street violence.”
I wonder about your knowledge of Scottish/English law or your scope of knowledge of other countries street violence.
I don’t know about what you consider experience but I have killed a lot of people and trained others to do it for over 20 years with the military. And they fight in the streets in other countries. I can attest to that.
wy69
“What else is she supposed to use to defend herself from rapefuges?”
She was using them to the extent her friend gave up and left the confrontation and was not seen again...her feet which she refused to use. If you don’t think the law is fair, there isn’t a whole lot you can do about it unless you are a Scottish citizen. It’s their law.
wy69
I’d support her 1000% if she had completely dismembered that “migrant”.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahaha!!!
As a thoroughly reasonable person, I routinely carry a loaded handgun, a spare magazine, and a liner-lock knife.
You, ma'am, speak like a poltroon ...
“There are two possible explanations for your low IQ statement above.”
1. you don’t understand how disarming normal people is the first strategy of the global criminals.
Wrong, the first strategy of the global criminal is to remove the problem in front of them even to the point of killing it. In other countries, they do shoot people and get shot. I’ve seen and done.
2. you’re working for the global criminals
There were a number of global criminals that would gladly have been happy I was killed. Since that’s the case. they did’t pay me enough.
And if you had an I.Q. higher than mine, you’d have seen it was not in the US where our laws are different. And whether you like them or not, even in the US we have a right to our opinion if there is enough proof to the scenario. And that really hampers your I.Q. statement when I produced an explanation to the law, and pointed out the problems with the trying to clear the girl from her part in it. You must be a liberal, they try to tarnish the messenger when they can’t the facts. And being liberal automatically removes 10 points from your I.Q.
wy69
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.