Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Many F-47 Fighters and B-21 Raider Bombers Does the U.S. Need?
National Security Journal ^ | 8/20/2025 | Andrew Latham

Posted on 08/21/2025 5:12:48 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: whyilovetexas111

We need a minimum of 2000 of each...


41 posted on 08/21/2025 10:30:06 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Good point.


42 posted on 08/21/2025 12:08:37 PM PDT by Rappini ("In hoc Signo Vinces" In this sign, you shall conquer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: delta7
China is not Russia, they are the manufacturing king on the planet.

Unfortunately, we have no military advantage against an allied Russia and China.


China is the cheap crap manufacturing king, but that's about it. And huge chunks of SE Asia are muscling in on that action. China has the advantage of already being set up, but other countries are taking the cheapest labor positions.


We have plenty of military advantage, even if they actually fought together. Russia can barely get 100 miles out of her borders, against a country with no navy and a tiny, obsolete air force. And they're still taking heavier losses. Russia would be fighting a 100% defensive war against these US.

China's not much better off. We'll ignore India getting fiesty while China fights these US, but they'll be almost entirely defensive as well. At best they'll have saboteurs and a couple sneaky connex strikes, but that's it. They may have more floating carriers than Russia, but no bluewater, nighttime, or combat tempo operations experience. Two of them are ski-jumpers (Soviet and Soviet-copy ships), and the third is at least catapult, but still non-nuclear. Still in sea trials. None of them are much of any threat to us.

Neither country has any logistical capability to support offshore operations, much less in contested waters, much less 1000s of miles across the Pacific. Russia has minimal submarine threat, and that's it. But every CPT Ivan knows the second he floods his tubes, he's as good as sunk. China is questionable on successfully taking Taiwan, much less Guam, much less Midway, HI, CA...

How is us fighting far away a fool's errand? We haven't militarily lost a war - our only defeats have been political/popular losses, not military. Vietnam, Afghanistan, we just left. And it's much better to fight in the other guy's yard, not yours! Defensive fights are not how you win wars nor destroy the enemy's desire to end the fight.
43 posted on 08/21/2025 12:59:42 PM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
Wasn’t it Stalin that said, “Quantity has a quality all its own”?

It sure does, but it's not the be-all end-all factor.

Look up Rorke's Drift or Agincourt or 73 Easting..
44 posted on 08/21/2025 2:05:53 PM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson