JUST IN: Obama Judge in San Francisco Blocks President Trump From Revoking ‘Temporary’ Protected Status For Hundreds of Thousands of Venezuelan Migrants

Gateway Pundit ^ | March 31, 2025 | Cullen Linebargar

[FlingWingFlyer]

Another friggin’ foreign POS “judgey wudgey”? WTH?

[pollywog]

I agree!!!!!!!!!! IGNORE THE JUDGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[hanamizu]

(What recourse do these lower courts have if they’re ignored?) Impeachment!

---

If or when the dems get control of the House, impeachment will quickly follow. Whether it’s defying a court order, a phone call, or just ‘dastardly deeds’, Trump will be impeached.

[lastchance]

Has the meaning of “temporary” changed. AFAIK unless the law spells out exactly how long temporary is specified for that definition would be up to the person in charge of our nation’s immigration laws or whomever he delegates that decision to.

[lastchance]

A growing support for the 2nd Amendment?

[ModelBreaker]

I don’t think Trump is comfortable with the Republicans in Congress.
They are not to be trusted where this downsizing exercise is concerned.

---

Congress and their omnibus bills is the problem. They don’t want to control spending. D’s or R’s.

[gildafarrell]

For cryin’ out loud, another disreputable demoncRAT judge trying to take power from the President. Sheesh!

[Darksheare]

And it was just as much an overreach by him as well.

[packagingguy]

I’ve known several Venezuelans who are doctors, businessmen and professors. But they came here legally (to flee the communists).

[bitt]

p

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

I don’t suppose this ruling would be any better for us if the judge were named Smith?

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

The ruling applies to the entire universe, so if there are any protected Venezuelans on Alderaan, Trump cannot use the Death Star to blow it up.

[pacificus]

Under what legal authority does this judge have the right to issue this ruling?

Impeach immediately.

[Sgt_Schultze]

If the three branches are co-equal, what precisely is the process for a president to overrule a judge?

[Words Matter]

Lawfare is back full speed

[meyer]

These judges have no standing - ignore them.

[Political Junkie Too]

This just proves that nothing is "temporary" in DC, even something called Temporary Protected Status.

-PJ

[John S Mosby]

Ignore a San Fran fruity, with non-citizen background. No power and no power to enforce “judgements” and “orders”.

The Federal Marshals could very well be ordered to stop activist judges. An Executive function as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer.

Essential the House kept Repub, MAGA Repub. Add to the numbers. Hardball lawmaking, remove the DC District Court from existence.

[Fury]

The Federal Marshals could very well be ordered to stop activist judges.

LOL! From doing what?

[Truth not Theories]

Taken from “250 years ago Alexander Hamilton Told Us How to Handle These Anti-Trump Judges” commentary by By C. Douglas Golden March 30, 2025 at 6:25am

https://www.westernjournal.com/commentary/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=newsletter-fc&ff_campaign=flagandcrosspm&ff_content=western-journal

In Federalist No. 78, one of the most influential documents pertaining to the role of the judiciary in the then-proposed Constitution, Hamilton wrote that the courts “have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” and cannot effectuate those judgments on its own....The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword [Executive Branch] or the purse [Legislative Branch], no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever.

“It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”