Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEW: Judge Boasberg now thinks he’s entitled to obviously privileged information related to White House discussions over fighting his order on Venezuelan terror flights.
Julie Kelly on Twitter X ^ | March 20, 2025 | Julie Kelly

Posted on 03/20/2025 4:13:48 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Macho MAGA Man

Please explain to me what gives him standing to challenge these deportations. Who is the representing. Seems like he’s way outside his judicial duties.


41 posted on 03/20/2025 5:28:40 PM PDT by ncfool (we are witnessing the rebirth of American greatness 🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

“That doesn’t mean a president can break the law, ignore courts or oversight or do whatever the f they want.”

Depends on whether or not a court’s requests or demands are Constitutional. These rogue judges’ demands are not in their lanes.


42 posted on 03/20/2025 5:30:55 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz
I get it. You like the guy, but there is no way in hell anyone here would be cool if Obama would do the same crap.

LOL. I object to the clear violation of the separation of powers defined in the constitution, and its handmaiden executive privilege. If this were against Obama Biden, Bill Clinton - anyone - I would object because the judiciary does not have the authority to intervene this way.

Yes, I like the approach President Trump is taking to pulling back the fedgov's interference in all of our lives. No, he should not be able to ignore other branches of government when they are within the bounds of their authority, or when he is out of bounds of his authority.

That is not the situation here.

43 posted on 03/20/2025 5:33:20 PM PDT by MortMan (Charter member of AAAAA - American Association Against Alliteration Abuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

‘Depends on whether or not a court’s requests or demands are Constitutional. These rogue judges’ demands are not in their lanes.’

Of course.

Because you don’t get a result you like doesn’t mean it’s unconstitutional.


44 posted on 03/20/2025 5:33:40 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

I get it. You like the guy, but there is no way in hell anyone here would be cool if Obama would do the same crap.
.....

The same crap?
We get it. You hate Wartime President Trump.

Impeach him.
We’ve seen 2 hoax impeachments last time..

Try harder


45 posted on 03/20/2025 5:35:55 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising

That’s why I say revoke his security clearance.


46 posted on 03/20/2025 5:37:00 PM PDT by McGavin999 ( A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore……)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Do I dare head over to NR and see what McCarthy has to say about it. He’s probably defending the judge and Roberts’ “process” but I may just take a look anyway.


47 posted on 03/20/2025 5:38:01 PM PDT by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“He’s now wanting privileged cabinet discussions.”

So I actually read the order (it’s only 4 lines) - there’s nothing actually in there that requires disclosure of anything privileged. There’s enough to criticize about this guy without making things up.


48 posted on 03/20/2025 5:40:00 PM PDT by CraigEsq (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

‘ LOL. I object to the clear violation of the separation of powers defined in the constitution, and its handmaiden executive privilege.’

It apparent you don’t know what separation of powers means because you’re advocating for the presidency to be the final arbiter of what is constitutional. That’s a monarchy.

‘If this were against Obama Biden, Bill Clinton - anyone - I would object because the judiciary does not have the authority to intervene this way.’

I think you are either lying or confused.

Biden lost in court a lot. Had he ignored the decisions, advocated for their impeachment or imprisonment you’d have been cool with that?

Don’t answer, it’s not necessary.


49 posted on 03/20/2025 5:47:25 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

‘ We get it. You hate Wartime President Trump.’

We’re not at war, yet.

My personal opinion of the person holding the office is irrelevant, as is yours.


50 posted on 03/20/2025 5:49:12 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ARW

Let us know what you find out.


51 posted on 03/20/2025 5:54:32 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical object)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It’s exactly what I thought but in some ways worse. Might as well go to DU.


52 posted on 03/20/2025 5:59:30 PM PDT by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

We’ve been at war since 9/11/01..

One of those global wars that continues.

Unless one wants to tell the Houthis that the war on Terror is over.

Or that the invasion declared by the President on his first day of his second Administration and the military movements to the border wasn’t real.

Or the operations across the border against Designated Terrorist Organizations aka Cartels is a figment of our imagination.

MS-13- Foreign Terrorist Organization
Tren De Aragua - Foreign Terrorist Organization

It seems the stolen election and the Invasion has had FAFO consequences for Foreign Terrorist Organizations.


53 posted on 03/20/2025 5:59:55 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

Calling something a ‘war’ doesn’t mean the country is at war, example, war on drugs.

Quit playing word games. It’s foolish, especially when used to justify bs.


54 posted on 03/20/2025 6:04:24 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

What’s the bs?


55 posted on 03/20/2025 6:08:52 PM PDT by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

Word games?
Not sure how the word War is a game..

Isn’t this what lawfare is all about?
Word games?

Did Trump play word games by declaring an Invasion?

Is President Trump trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes by declaring an invasion, knowing that is a trigger to Powers of the President?

Is it BS?


56 posted on 03/20/2025 6:13:53 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

‘ Word games?
Not sure how the word War is a game..’

I gave an example, so it should be obvious. War on drugs isn’t an actual war.

‘Isn’t this what lawfare is all about?
Word games?’

No idea. You’re muddying the waters here and it’s irrelevant.

‘Did Trump play word games by declaring an Invasion?’

Yes if he’s attempting to declare wartime powers.

‘’Is President Trump trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes by declaring an invasion, knowing that is a trigger to Powers of the President?’

Yes.

‘Is it BS?’

Again, yes.


57 posted on 03/20/2025 6:20:40 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fuzz

Did Trump play word games by declaring an Invasion?’

Yes if he’s attempting to declare wartime powers.

‘’Is President Trump trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes by declaring an invasion, knowing that is a trigger to Powers of the President?’

Yes.

‘Is it BS?’

Again, yes.
...........

So you don’t believe the United States had open borders and an invasion.

At least we now exactly why you’re side is bent out of shape about Wartime President Trump operations against Foreign Terrorist Organizations and his declaration of an Invasion.

Thanks for showing your side.. the Deep State is strong with you..

Just know, stolen elections and invasions have consequences.

Thanks for playing

So glad your Kamala lost


58 posted on 03/20/2025 6:30:35 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

Declaring illegal immigration, drugs, maga, poverty, etc wars does not mean the country is at war.

It’s a simple concept.


59 posted on 03/20/2025 6:37:24 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

This is one demanding judge!

Hey Bo-ass, attempt a rapid aerial seduction of a rolling perforated pastry.


60 posted on 03/20/2025 6:56:13 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Hope, as a righteous product of properly aligned Faith, IS in fact a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson