Posted on 06/07/2024 10:11:51 PM PDT by lasereye
My daughter is a paralegal. When she reported for jury duty, the defense preemptively removed her. The Defense usually doesn’t want anyone with legal experience on the jury. They have an outsized influence on the jury.
The two presumably two leftist lawyers on Trump’s jury were there to convict him.
Or he wants everyone to assume that he did that.
People posting Merchan wants a mistrial.
Then why hasn’t he deemed it so? He doesn’t need anything further to make that ruling. He would’ve been notifying both sides of his ruling to declare it a Mistrial.
This is his greatest achievement in his life by far, no way he undoes his perfect Trial and Verdict.
OR, this Michael Anderson is just an internet troll......
The entire jury had a predetermined guilty verdict as did Merchan who basically instructed the jury to find him guilty and actively blocked the defense. The whole thing was a sham.
Yes, he could have made that ruling but he would have been totally trashed by his own side and he wanted this guilty verdict too. Only thing is that someone needs to take the blame other than himself for a mistrial.
After the verdict he found out what a giant mistake the whole sham show trial was. It only helped Trump more and turned off some important people on his own side.
A mistrial can stop things in it’s tracks for now with a promise of taking it up later and squash any appeals by Trump which we all know will be a huge admonishment of the sham of this show trial with a predetermined outcome.
I agree with what the law professor proposes. I personally thought that, before the trial started, PDJT should have recruited one or more GOP state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of their state or states versus the state of New York in the U. S. Supreme Court, invoking the original jurisdiction that the USSC has in lawsuits between state governments, and sought a writ of prohibition (or other injunctive relief) against the state of New York going forward with the trial.
Mark Levin has been talking about similar concepts in his really great radio broadcasts of the last few days. He is urging PDJT’s legal team to bring an action on his behalf directly to the USSC, I think pursuant to USSC Rule 20, requesting the issuance of a “common law writ” such as a writ of prohibition. Whether the USSC would grant PDJT such access to its processes is iffy, because he has not yet exhausted his appeal rights in the NY state court system. However, if a state (such as, say, Texas or Missouri or North Dakota, etc.) sued New York state, the USSC would have to take the case and make some sort of decision. The states would be arguing that NY is violating the civil rights of their citizens who voted to nominate PDJT for president in violation of federal statutes such as 42 USC 1983 or 18 USC 241, and that the USSC must issue a writ that prevents NY state from going any further in the NY v. Trump case.
In addition to the 5th, 6th and 14th amendment violations that have been perpetrated by the firm of Bragg, Colangelo and Merchan, there is also an “ex post facto” law claim that can be raised here. Sometime after the time that the business records at issue in this litigation were created, the NY state legislature passed a law which extended the statute of limitations law by a year. IMO, this is “ex post facto” law which is unconstitutional under the main body of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3. The indictment against PDJT after the end of the 5 year statute of limitations for felonies but before the extra year tacked on the NY legislature ran out. The NY state constitution does not have a provision that is similar to the federal constitution. However, there is at least one state appellate decision in New York, People v. Hudy, that suggests that it does in fact apply.
Assuming the post by the cousin is legitimate, it doesn’t necessarily prove a predetermined outcome (although it’s clear that was already in the cards) but it does prove that juror discussed the case with people outside jury deliberations in violation of jury instructions. If it was any defendant besides Trump or one of his allies, a mistrial would be automatic.
Even if they wanted to retry Trump , it won’t happen any tine really soon. Trump’s team may go for different venue etc.
It may be possible that a current case SCOTUS is deciding on could nullify this whole thing.
Not sure, but possible.
They randomly ignored the judges that were supposed to be appointed and took this guy who wasn’t on the list
I have no doubt that Trump will win on appeal. But irreparable harm has been done unless it is resolved prior to the election. The regular appellate procedure takes too long and there is no guarantee that the NY appellate courts will overturn the decision.
Every possible effort needs to be made to get this case before SCOTUS. And Congress needs to get involved as well.
Your opinion is likely exactly what’s going to happen. The next week or so will tell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.