Based on his appearance, so won’t Schwab.
Why doesn’t someone just shoot this Nazi prick?
Just genuinely curious, not advocating anything.
Once again, whatever nefarious thing the left accuses the right of doing or plannings is exactly what the left is doing or planning.
please Lord, deal with Klaus.
Wishful thinking
AI will never know how each person will vote. What Schwab is saying is that they can surveil and gather intelligence and AI can predict outcomes at a high level. Top down not bottoms up. But good enough to decide races - so they claim.
But if they can predict the voting outcomes of voters then they can likely predict the voting outcomes of representatives. In that world you may as well do away with congressmen too.
What this results in is a country or the world that is administered by machines that would decide how people work, how they receive subsistence, medicines, etc and who lives and dies.
There would still be a central group that oversees the AI self-learning software and programming. Yes, AI learns by itself but there would still be a group that oversees and controls how the AI-based administrative state works.
That core group would retain the real power of the state. Supreme Soviet if you like.
I’m ready. Nothing beats a virtual jackboot in the face as you wake-up for another day of toil for the state.
“When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government.”
Declaration of Independence