Posted on 06/16/2023 8:24:12 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Their greatest weakness is they are forced to hide their dark side.
It is what killed them.
It might have been the CIA or somebody else in government, but there’s a chance that her ex-husband had been able to get over it and move on.
FWIW, on his mother’s side, Cord Meyer was related to Harry Thaw who did kill out of jealousy in a famous early 20th century case.
The Lord Jesus Christ reigns, and brings Justice!
There is one fascinating “conspiracy theory” guy out there who claims he can name one of the assassins—someone who was a public figure at the time and who claimed to be in the motorcade—but kept changing his story as to exactly which vehicle he was in....
The alleged assassin (part of a “team”)—key future LBJ aide Jack Valenti.
Here is the “official” version of Jack Valenti’s life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Valenti
Many years ago I actually met and shook hands and looked into the eyes of Jack Valenti.
The man was stone cold evil—definitely was capable of the deed.
The other fascinating part of the Jack Valenti saga is that there were rumors at the time that Valenti’s marriage to LJB’s Secretary was a “fake” and that LBJ was having an affair with her for years.
That affair allegedly produced three children which were claimed to be the children of Valenti, not LBJ.
The rumors were that Valenti was a homosexual (even though an FBI investigation “cleared” him—clout mattered then as it does today).
After more than seventy years much of the history of the period is buried in secrecy and lies.
Valenti had close ties to the Mob, Mossad, the CIA and LBJ.
He checked all the boxes....
The metaphor of a house built on sand is simple to comprehend, including through a secular lens.
As a group founded on the occult, the CIA bases its existence on lies.
The lifespan of falsehood is variable but finite, and cosmologically short.
Truth lives eternally.
Yes.
Listening to a part of the podcast, about 1:15, in which Kennedy and Rogan discussed the modern proliferation of chronic diseases in children.
Reminds One Guy of Trump’s recent similar policy statement elevating that issue to a high campaign priority.
So many parallels between what Trump and Kennedy are saying.
He’s not as serious a threat as his father was. The Democrats and the Deep State would probably get behind Newsom, who could crush Kennedy. They’re more likely to do something to get Kamala out of the way than Kennedy.
Not that it was or wasn’t them, but I don’t think the CIA’s preferred method of assassination has been to use patsies for a long time. I bet they don’t think they even use ‘mind control’ or manchurian candidate types for hard targets either. That’s too old and unreliable and potentially has too many loose ends. By the late 60s it seemed like overdosing with most common, early on by a home invasion team but also by clandestine spiking of medications or food. Anymore they don’t even have to make it look like an overdose, just heart failure. Who and how was Andrew Breitbart killed?
In just one casually-uttered phrase One Guy just heard, Kennedy showed without a doubt his subtle but comprehensive erudition, and his capacity effortlessly to communicate complex ideas.
He and Rogan were discussing potential long-term consequences of the COVID-10 mRNA-based so-called “vaccines”, Kennedy said: “Now we don’t know what any of the long-term effects are. There’s a lot of [potential] impacts with these vaccines, like any other drug, that have long diagnostic horizons and long incubation periods, and if you don’t have a five-year placebo-controlled trial, as Fauci himself said, in eight years, he said, you’re going to miss a lot, and you’re going to have mahem.”
Excellent point. True, in general, it’s a rudimentary point relating to medical trials of proposed active-ingredient medicaments. But it’s the way this sentence is structured, formed directly from out of his mind and memory in the context of an in-depth discussion, that seems unique among any major party POTUS candidate for the last fifty years at least, and in truth unique among anyone speaking prominently for public consumption today. And—who has ever heard the two phrases “long diagnostic horizons” and “long incubation periods” uttered for public consumption, ever? But Kennedy not only drops them into conversation with Rogan, he does do grammatically perfectly, in real time, and with real persuasive power, for literally the average “Joe”!
Oh yes...and this is his solution to dealing with those who disagree: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Wants To Jail His Political Opponents
Kennedy said, about Fauci’s deputies profiting from pharma products they worked on (and thereby get up to $150,000.00 per year each in royalties based on patent exclusivity), that “mercantile ambitions have subsumed the regulatory functions of these agencies, and that has to end.”
Nobody but Kennedy is knocking it out of the park like this.
Subsumed. What a great word.
Lovin’ it.
Your citation is accurate.
But-—and I hesitate to emphasize this, bu feel compelled to—the citation is nine years old.
I don’t know for sure, but I have the distinct feeling that Robert Kennedy Jr. has undergone a significant transformation in his thinking since that time, together with some significant political maturation, that has produced in him a certain brand of presidential “timber” in his character that wasn’t there before (even if the issues he has with vocal cord palsy mean that his voice lacks presidential “timbre”!)..
He hits out a Trump starting at about 2:35:00 in the podcast.
It’s subtle.
Kennedy talks to Rogan about how his uncles and father tried to head off revolutions in Latin American countries by buttressing the middle classes in those countries rather than allowing revolution to fester and eventually explode among a too-large and marginalized, desperate lower class against the uncaring ruling elites and military thugs, the idea being that such revolutions eventually tend to be overtaken by communists who twist things and corrupt things in their own characteristically evil way so as to permanently deprive the people of the fulfilled lives and improved quality of life and relief from poverty they were striving for.
He then says we are sadly in a similar state now in America, or are quickly heading in that direction. Kennedy says “I would say the same thing is happening in this country, that the oligarchs are running things, and the military, and there’s going to be a revolution, and either it can be owned by Donald Trump, or we can try to marshall and mobilize that energy for a more idealistic vision of our country.”
Like it or not, he is taking it to DJT, whose individual vision for this country, while admirable, is perhaps not precise or “non-hazy” enough to qualify as idealistic, and thus arguably suffers from considerable losses through friction.
FYI All: The CIA-related commentary comes well after the 3:00:00 mark of a podcast that is about 3:05:00 in length.
Kennedy says he has no fear, but is trying to be careful. He says he has decided not to do things that require him to plunge mire or less alone (and thus vulnerable) into large groups of people. So he’s definitely trying to limit his exposure to situations in which he could potentially be snuffed out by the kinds of nameless, faceless, elite but thuggish people he clearly thinks killed his father and his uncle (JFK).
I think the vast majority of rats, libs, progressives and commies believe that Trump is a victim of the deep state, but they are willing to publicly deny it or it least feign willful blindness because the target is Trump. But if JFK dies in a fiery car crash, falls of a high-rise balcony, or worse, we might end up with unfriendly allies.
You mean, allies who were previously unfriendly?
any pics of the kids anywhere to see if they looked like the husband or LBJ?
There are so many ways an intelligence agency can assassinate someone.
The history of assassinations around the world are all you need to make a list.
Worse yet—they don’t need a 100% success rate—they can keep trying over and over again....
The key is they need control over the mass media—so they can control the narrative after successful (or unsuccessful) efforts. Anyone who claims “conspiracy” is called a kook or a right-wing extremist.
While bullets are the most “famous” cases imho the best controlled narrative cases involve airplane crashes—whether private plane or commercial airlines.
To this day many Freepers are convinced that JFK Jr. was a reckless pilot—despite no past history of that.
Another “plane” hit (imho) was Ron Brown.
Howard Hunt’s “bag lady CIA” wife during Watergate was in a commercial crash at the height of the investigations.
There have also been a couple of US Senators who died in plane crashes—way above statistical probability.
In addition there are a bunch of foreign leaders—civilian and military that have died in airplane “accidents”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.