Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Distracted, Woke US Navy Can’t Launch A Ship Without Breaking It
armedforces.press ^ | April 23, 2023 | John Hughes

Posted on 04/23/2023 1:49:46 PM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: maddog55

Wouldn’t that just be part of the normal contractor’s operation?


61 posted on 04/24/2023 4:41:59 AM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Correct..


62 posted on 04/24/2023 5:48:38 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: OldWarBaby
—And there’s a reason the tug is there.

Watching the video it looks to me like the tug tried to move but was somehow either stuck or moored to either the launching ship or to something on the slipway.

You can see before the actual launch that there's a "rooster tail" at the back of the tug, but the tug doesn't move.

A way bigger problem is what is the Navy going to do with a hull they didn’t want? They’ve been trying to give away the LCS’s they already have?

That indeed is a greater question. I've suggested in the past that since the USCG currently has a large cutter program in work (Offshore Patrol Cutter, a 360 ft cutter with a 10,000 mile range and 22 knot top speed) that some of the Navy's LCS be transferred to the USCG for their use in lieu of some of the OPCs, but that idea was shot down as unworkable by several Coasties.

Apparently the unrefueled range of the LCSs is not enough for USCG use, and the USCG would have to refit standard diesel engines in place of the Gas Turbines and replace the jet drive with conventional screws to reduce lifetime operating costs and again increase range.

63 posted on 04/24/2023 5:56:55 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Why are you so vague that no one knows what you are talking about?


64 posted on 04/24/2023 6:01:59 AM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“this will clearly only happen with elections in 2024 to put politicians in place to ‘clean house’”

The traditional route for a nation is via a horrific war that it is losing badly. At that point, its leadership has a choice of “cleaning house” or losing everything. No more make-believe.


65 posted on 04/24/2023 6:09:11 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

66 posted on 04/24/2023 6:12:28 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You asked:
Wouldn’t that just be part of the normal contractor’s operation?

I Answered:
Correct

What’s vague about that?


67 posted on 04/24/2023 7:36:36 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Remember: Obama fired all senior military who would NOT agree to shoot US citizens.


68 posted on 04/24/2023 7:40:46 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Here’s detailed info onhow it’s calculated:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334539042_Automatic_procedure_of_side_ship_launching_calculation

Here’s another side launched Navy ship.. you can see the tug boats here as well.


69 posted on 04/24/2023 7:43:54 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Here’s detailed info onhow it’s calculated:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334539042_Automatic_procedure_of_side_ship_launching_calculation

Here’s another side launched Navy ship.. you can see the tug boats here as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Quyr5R1Rbfw&t=20s


70 posted on 04/24/2023 7:44:05 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Because I sure don’t.


71 posted on 04/24/2023 8:17:45 AM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL, that is a great scene!

That one, and “Get off the babysitter!” yelled through a megaphone!


72 posted on 04/24/2023 8:23:13 AM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

That is a good point. When the Champaign bottle breaks is it commissioned or after some paperwork is signed? Does the Navy person at the ceremony have any control over what happens or is he just watching?


73 posted on 04/24/2023 8:53:58 AM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

I’m guessing there would be some kind of approval process/inspection before the contractor is paid off by the government. Ships usually go through sea trails before they are officially added to the fleet as well.


74 posted on 04/24/2023 10:10:16 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Ok thanks Friend


75 posted on 04/24/2023 11:21:45 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

It got weird with 59 and 62 is when it got weird and has stayed weird.

We all know the tug is there and part of the operation, everyone knows.


76 posted on 04/24/2023 11:24:02 AM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson