Posted on 01/07/2023 7:29:42 AM PST by shadowlands1960
AHH, the AP (All Propaganda). MUST BE TRUE! /S
got to cover dat azz
Consider if there had been no COVID and, therefore, no experimental “vaccines” in our social reality. In such a world, the fallen Buffalo player would very likely have been attended to differently, carted off the field, to a prompt resumption of the game. Instead, it was morose with an underlying current that, due to politics, must not be spoken of or speculated about. Obviously, just my theory and opinion.
I'd like to know that too.
What I do know is those claiming there's been a big increase in sudden deaths of athletes are either making up the numbers, speculating without numbers, or flat-out lying like McCullough and Polykretis.
“Baselessly”
Already on my list of BS words and phrases.
You would think even Leftist editors would tone down the repetition, for fear of giving the game away.
When I want facts checked I go to the research scientists at AP. /s
If these claims are baseless, the burden of proof is on Big Pharma and Big Gov to prove they are baseless, not the other way around.
In fact, by law, they were required to prove that BEFORE the “vaccines” were ever distributed.
And mandating the “vaccines” was/is criminal regardless.
What I do know is those claiming there’s been a big increase in sudden deaths of athletes are either making up the numbers, speculating without numbers, or flat-out lying like McCullough and Polykretis.
I’m surprised the FR $$s, who’ve dug way deep into this Safe and Effective premise, haven’t jumped on, to defend A$$ Pre$$, on this whopper.
I wonder how much govt funding goes to paying AssPress fact-checkers?
The coverup and gaslighting continues.
As with most of the rest of the media, AP is nothing but a joke.
You don’t buy the claim at the end of the article that they are just trying to counter ‘misinformation?’
—
You missed my “/s” Sarcastic
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sarcastic
The written word unlike the spoken word is not very good at indicating sarcasm so we have to let the reader know what you are writing in not meant to be taken literally but is mocking something.
Before COVID in general, too. To leave no doubt (and the fact that lockdowns curtailed much activity).
There really should be an honest, scholarly, thorough study of not just how many after, but how many BEFORE.
This article claims that the research was really shallow and possibly just made up, from some casual observer.
We need much better than that. Otherwise it’s a house of cards.
Besides, I’m still mostly worried about long-term illness - cancers, etc, down the road.
But, percents are still more important than absolute counts.
So, if only 2000 players were around then, that would be horrible % vs maybe 2000000 players the last few years.
Probably won’t be much different, or will be some increase, but percent is where it’s at, not numbers.
At least ap is a constant liar
woops- sorry- i copied and pasted the wrong quote=- i meant ot quote your post
[[Well, there is the meme out that 1200+ athletes died on the field from 1970 - 2000, and 1500+ athletes died on the field from 2021 - 2022]]
my response was to that quote- not the one i posted by mistake-
if that claim is true, vaccine makers have a lot of explaining to do. They shouldn’t be allowed to run from the facts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.