Posted on 10/16/2022 10:27:26 AM PDT by bitt
That word, "widespread" is used intentionally. The corrupt can't say, "You have no proof of election fraud". So it begs the question, who determines what widespread means? The lying media? lol....
Corruption in key states/regions are enough to subvert an election...So does it need to be "widespread" based on whatever the media's definition is? If I were a campaign manager, I'd tell my candidate if they ask for proof of widespread voter fraud, ask them back if they have proof or evidence that election fraud does not exist.
We must not allow skittish Democrats to redefine "debating" as appearing separately on the same show with the same interviewer.
Lake does not have the opportunity to directly challenge Hobbs. Hobbs is relying on the interviewer to not probe too deeply into her positions, something which Lake would do relentlessly on a debate stage.
Conversely, Hobbs knows that she could never effectively challenge Lake in-kind, making her look weak and unassertive compared to Lake.
This is why Hobbs prefers to have a staged, seated and favorably lighted split-frame discussion with a friendly moderator, than be seen standing side-by-side with Lake on a debate stage.
-PJ
No, Biden would say it to a pre-teen or teenage girl.
I said it to a woman.
Bkmk
Gross.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.