Posted on 02/26/2022 2:15:32 PM PST by Enterprise
You’re right. They say skin contact
“ • A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
” The point was made that it is not used and I showed it was. “
You didn’t.
‘shedding’ thru the swapping of bodily fluids.
which and how i’ll leave up to your imagination
Erm. Perhaps you don’t know this but “Graphene is a zero-gap semiconductor, because its conduction and valence bands meet at the Dirac points. The Dirac points are six locations in momentum space, on the edge of the Brillouin zone, divided into two non-equivalent sets of three points. The two sets are labeled K and K’. The sets give graphene a valley degeneracy of gv = 2. By contrast, for traditional semiconductors the primary point of interest is generally Γ, where momentum is zero.”
Really? You're slackin'. Read some of the threads that use the "Daily Expose" that are started by one FReeper in particular. There are some facts in the articles. but lots of crap, such as that SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated and "purified".
“You’re right. They say skin contact”
And it is a generic reporting requirement for the studies, not a precaution.
Amazing how conspiracists jerk people around.
Hell no! That's how the Lizard people find you and steal your letters.
Hey, look... they've already ripped off some of yours!
They're trying to make you look stupid by causing you
to misspell "you".
You need an exorcist and some dope.
All I was trying to explain was that there is a Pfizer doc that is being referred to. Whether you agree with how the info is being interpreted is another thing. However, it was not a conspiracy when I said a document existed. Honestly, I won’t refer to anything unless I have ‘receipts’. Rumors equally bother me. But, this has been available for 1.5 years, so I am surprised you haven’t seen it yet. Now you can say you have.
Perhaps you can't read well, but I made no mention of Graphene.
Either read the studies or shut up. You turn to post a link that proves they have not been testing the use of graphene oxide as a nano-adjuvant in vaccines.
Those companies do not spend millions of dollars to not use something they have been testing. My point stands it has been considered and may be used, also it has likely been used at least in testing. As for covid, all I said was to not be so sure, and even at that, I said it is BS that it sheds.
Your religious-like faith in government medicine which literally has been exempted from all liability is astounding. If it were so absolutely safe it would not need the liability exemption, but you go ahead and keep preaching it cult member.
“”Dr. Philippe Van Welbergen, medical director of Biomedics Clinic in the United Kingdom, recently demonstrated that the graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines is organizing and growing into large fibers and structures, gaining magnetic properties and becoming more complex.
Van Welbergen also found that the nuclei of the cells were destroyed and many of them were starting to form large gold tubular structures.
Van Welbergen also warned that he was starting to notice a magnetic or electric polarity effect on different sides of the graphene fibers. This behavior was not present when he first started examining the blood of his vaccinated patients, but they were now popping up out of nowhere.”
[btw, all FReepers stupid enough to believe ANY of the above nonsense, please raise their hands ...]
Skwor wrote: “Serious, using PolitiFact as a fact-checker? That is like asking Hitler if he was gassing jews. Using PolitiFact is no different than the op posting the stuff about the shot in this thread. Let’s try to use actually sources that do not make a habit of lying and being a propaganda organ for the state..ok?!”
I’ll choose what sources I want to post. However, I’m open to suggestions. What would you find as a credible source to fact check the anti-vaxxer propaganda?
“This just makes it harder for those who have a valid argument against the shot.”
~~~~~~~
That is the purpose of these over the top BS articles.
That, and to paint all who question the narrative as retarded.
Yikes 😳
“All I was trying to explain was that there is a Pfizer doc that is being referred to.”
LOL! You think your earlier post is not still up?
You: but Pfizer stated in the beginning that pregnant women should not have unprotected sex.
You can easily prove you’re not dead.
You can prove at least some negatives. That’s not an absolute statement.
“Either read the studies or shut up.”
Screw the studies. Show me documentation on which COVID vaccines contain graphene or shut up.
Not Politifact. I literally posted the Pfizer pdf, which is at least something a person can take to the court as a legal document in a debate as to what is in the vaccine. Not likely omit ingredients but would not be the first time a business has lede like that if they have.
Per their pdf it has no graphene in any composition. My issue is not the graphene, it is the spike proteins that are pooly understood and have no long-term clinical data.
Who cares.
I am not taking this crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.