Posted on 10/05/2021 9:09:52 AM PDT by A.M. Smith
Alright wiesenheimer, my “v” was on strike earlier lol
The mRNA shot was invented long before the Wuhan Flu came along.
It is a product of CRISPR technology which is used for editing the genes of living organisms.
One company that utilizes CRISPR and mRNA is TriLink and they’re not bad guys here, okay? They’re up front and honest about what they do.
https://www.trilinkbiotech.com/application/crispr
The point is that these technologies are intended to CHANGE an individual at the genetic level. It is not a ‘vaccine’ but instead is genetic modification.
What’s unclear is what is the desired effect of rewriting the human genome in primarily developed countries?
Is it a coincidence that the primary advocates of the mRNA shot have long supported the eradication of most of the human population?
But is that really true? Let's look at the actual words of those various interviewed "Pfizer Scientists":
... "probably" ... "most likely" ... "I still feel like I" ... "maybe potentially" ... "probably more" ... "you're protected mostly likely for longer since there was a natural response" ...
The only consistency in those comments from the Pfizer scientists is a ton of vagueness & ambiguity. They're not really sure about what they're saying.
Here's a quote from one of the interviewed Pfizer scientists that you may have missed: "If your immunity starts to wane, then get vaccinated." Even that statement is rather vague. What exactly does "your immunity starts to wane" mean?
So there you have it. Even the scientific community is unsure, both those on one "side" of the debate and those on the other (i.e., for the vaccine, or for natural immunity).
Every case is different; try to do whatever you think is best for yourself. And if you're not only out for yourself, you may also want to consider how your actions affect others.
Doctors are as self-interested as anyone else. There is nothing particularly virtuous about them, just as there isn’t anything inherently virtuous about public defenders, nonprofit owners, charity directors, politicians, or activists. There are saints and sinners in every field of endeavor. Doctors in particular are caught up in a squeeze among lawyers, insurance companies, Medicare administrators, professional organizations, and the need to pay for their education loans, staff and equipment. I don’t blame anyone for exercising self-interest. We can’t change that and we can’t force others to reject it. We can just exercise due caution in trusting others.
CDC et al is supposed to be the check. instead they are in bed w big pharma
What are the names of the people you say are enthusiastically "advocating" that the vast "majority" of humans be "eradicated" and entirely wiped off the face of the Earth?
The CDC is promoted as a check but it is, first and foremost, a bureaucracy which has as its mission self-perpetuation and not self-aggrandizement. As I have said earlier, no one is looking out for your best interests and if they claim to be doing so, be doubly suspicious. I think it was Mark Twain who wrote the more a person proclaimed his virtue, the more he (Twain) checked to be sure his wallet was still safe. The only person you can trust to care for you is yourself and God.
I wasn’t saying go after the creators, but rather the ilk who pushed it on the people and lied to them about how effective it would be. If it is opening people up to reinfecfions, then it is likely increases their chances of not surviving the virus, putting putting at greater risk, if that is Indeed what is happening? Someone needs to be held accountable if that is the case, and it should be the ones who pushed it, not the developers of the process.
Delete that “not” in front of self-aggrandizement. My proofreading is waning in my old age.
Here’s a good article that compiles numerous sources that pretty much spell it out. There’s a lot more information but why don’t we start with this since I suspect you’ve already made up your mind about this.
Bkmk
The investors do want that. Hopefully some can allow their ethics to strike a sane and acceptable balance. Investors have grandchildren, too, and you just have to hope they care more about kids’ health than a bump in stock prices.
That may not be the case much any more, though, with babies’and kids’lives becoming more invaluable each year
Your antennae are working perfectly; my mind is already made up. If there were even one well-known and credible person who holds any power at all in the Democrat Party Cabal/RINO/New World Order organization who made such a statement, there surely would be at least one well-known and reputable Republican or conservative news station or individual who would be repeatedly, loudly, and widely reporting about it. Yet, although I regularly check a variety of Republican and conservative news sources, I have not heard even one known, credible person or news station say one word about anything remotely like that. So that's why my mind is made up.
But if you'd be willing to name just one well-known and credible conservative or Republican news organization or individual who has made such an accusation, I'd be more than happy to hear it. I suspect you’ve already made up your mind that you will not name anyone (as though it's some kind of military secret).
“Your antennae are working perfectly; my mind is already made up”
Then we are done. Enjoy your day.
Most investors are only interested in return on investment and shareholders hold the CEO accountable.
As I guessed, you still wouldn’t provide even one name, so yes, we’re done. You have a good day, too.
I would agree but I suspect their argument would be that they don’t know it is harming people since the long-term studies are not complete. Every medicine has people who have serious, maybe fatal, reactions to it and they may be arguing that the present evidence is within the statistical noise. Of course, it would help if someone seriously looked at the evidence but I don’t see a lot of evidence that is being done by the governments or the vaccine companies.
I hear you...I referred to myself as a 'customer' instead of 'patient' at my doctor's office a few years back...oooooo, cold front.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.