Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Delivers Unanimous Decision On Guam's Bid To Get Payments From U.S. For Hazardous Dumping
Conservative Brief ^ | 5/24 | Martin Walsh

Posted on 05/24/2021 10:14:49 AM PDT by TrumpianRepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Renfrew
Seems fair. If the federal government dumped a bunch of waste in my state I would expect them to pay for the clean-up.

I'm sick of paying for government mistakes. Responsible parties need to be held to account.

21 posted on 05/24/2021 11:54:31 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Both this and the illegal deportee case were unanimous.

“Maximus” on Twit suggests the court is circling the wagons to prevent a court-packing scheme of adding two more justices by saying, “Won’t do you any good.”


22 posted on 05/24/2021 11:57:32 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TrumpianRepublican

A more interesting decision was written by Sotomayer, against an illegal alien.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-437_bqmc.pdf


23 posted on 05/24/2021 2:02:06 PM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Ok, so now they get paid for us dumping our $h!t there. Sounds good to me.


24 posted on 05/24/2021 2:24:07 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
The short answer: Monday’s ruling said Guam can pursue U.S. payments under the hazardous waste law.

The ruling, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, reversed a decision by a lower court that found a prior settlement had adequately “resolved Guam’s liability” for the dump.

Are you sure? Per the excerpt (bolded), it reads to me that a lower court found Guam no longer liable for cleanup costs, and the SC just reversed that decision. Which would mean they're adding more to what Guam is responsible for, not less?
25 posted on 05/27/2021 10:07:27 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson