Skip to comments.
Lindell Announces Launch Date for New Social Media Platform FrankSpeech and New Documentary
uncoverdc.com ^
| April 12, 2021
| John B. Nevin
Posted on 04/12/2021 6:16:58 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
So, Lindell's next video documentary ‘Absolute Interference’ premier for the debut of FrankSpeech.com. Hopefully, we will see NSA analysts give sworn statements about witnessing foreign interference in the election by hacking the vote. We now have eight days left to prep for what happens then.
To: Dr. Franklin
He’s going to have to make the app available direct download from the website, because Apple and Google sure as Hell ain’t going to put it in their app stores.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Not real app or computer savvy... Can I get his site on my MacOS Catalina?
To: Dr. Franklin
To: Dr. Franklin
...he says will be able to handle a billion people. More lies from the pillow guy.
To: Dr. Franklin
thank God for him, and may God protect him.
6
posted on
04/12/2021 6:32:17 PM PDT
by
dadfly
To: conservative98
https://www.frankspeech.com
I don't like needing a phone number to register. I would prefer a site that just asks for an email. I don't like being tracked like that. Maybe it's necessary to keep out the trolls.
7
posted on
04/12/2021 6:33:47 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: dadfly
thank God for him, and may God protect him.
Amen.
8
posted on
04/12/2021 6:34:39 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Dr. Franklin
Sounds good but who is Frank?
9
posted on
04/12/2021 6:43:25 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: Rebelbase
Sounds good but who is Frank?
The double meaning comes from Lindell publishing Dr. Douglas G. Frank's statistical analysis of the polynomial "keys" to the stolen 2020 elections.
10
posted on
04/12/2021 6:46:26 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Dr. Franklin
Get a secondary free voicemail number online
To: Dr. Franklin
I don't like needing a phone number to register. I'm with ya. Get a Google Voice number and use that instead. It's free.
12
posted on
04/12/2021 6:51:26 PM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: Rebelbase
It’s short for Frank Speech.
13
posted on
04/12/2021 6:54:34 PM PDT
by
MayflowerMadam
("if I perish, I perish." Esther 4:16)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Really cool.. what have you done in your miserable life?
14
posted on
04/12/2021 7:01:37 PM PDT
by
BatGuano
(color me "gone!")
To: Dr. Franklin
15
posted on
04/12/2021 7:02:25 PM PDT
by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
To: usconservative
I’m checking that out.
google huh?
I wonder who else offers similar.
16
posted on
04/12/2021 7:04:20 PM PDT
by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
He's not a liar, just an idiot. His pillows are not very good (I have two). He knows zero about any other topic.
17
posted on
04/12/2021 7:18:53 PM PDT
by
palmer
(Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
To: Dr. Franklin
Dr. Douglas G. Frank's statistical analysis of the polynomial "keys" to the stolen 2020 elections. Watched it, total garbage. A sixth order polynomial fit to a curve is not evidence of anything. As I pointed out in another thread, I can fit a sixth order polynomial to the temperature recorded at the nearby weather station. That is not "proof" that the temperature is recording algorithm is baised.
18
posted on
04/12/2021 7:21:47 PM PDT
by
palmer
(Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
To: palmer
A sixth order polynomial fit to a curve is not evidence of anything.
Great strawman, but that isn't what this is about. This is about graphing population, registered voters, and Nov. 2020 voters. What results is the polynomial function curve, but those curves fit the "key", not vice-versa. Unless you can prove that the underlying data is wrong, that it has been altered somehow, Frank's proof would stand up in court, provided we get past the standing BS.
19
posted on
04/12/2021 7:38:52 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Dr. Franklin
No, I watched the video although it was torture. The x axis is age and the two curves are actual and registered voters. Framk fit a polynormial to the actual voter curve, then claims the fit is proof of the manipulation. Even if the machines manipulate votes, which is entirely possible, the curve fits is not proof of that.
But the main problem is Frank doesn't understand vote counting and voter recording. The counting machines don't know who the voters are, they just count anonymous ballots. So they can't do what he says. Furthermore the actual voter curve doesn't come from the counting machine, it comes from envelope sticker scanning. The anonymous ballot is removed from that envelope. That's a big reason why ignoring the signature in GA, PA and elsewhere allowed so many fraudulent votes.
Frank's proof would stand up in court, provided we get past the standing BS.
Discovery will be costly for the plaintiffs. Lindell would end up paying a lot of money to voting machine companies because Frank is so obviously wrong. I think that's part of the goal here. But the main reason there are so many bonehead theories about algorithms is to distract from the actual massive fraud.
20
posted on
04/12/2021 8:22:00 PM PDT
by
palmer
(Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson