Skip to comments.
Fulton County Georgia Ballot Inspection Hearing Subverted – Georgia Stalling to Prevent Forensic Review of Suspected Fraudulent Absentee Ballots
Gateway Pundit ^
| 01/04/2021
| Joe Hoft
Posted on 01/04/2021 6:28:05 PM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: rollo tomasi
Where is the safe harbor in this case? There is none because the State legislature allowed the process to take place without objection, (Read the whole after what you cited instead of cherry picking) lol.
What are you talking about? You asked where the Governor is involved in the process; I gave you the code that specifically mentions him. And all that's after that sentence (which I omitted because it doesn't mention the Governor or SoS) is a bit saying the Houses then meet after voting an announce the results. They can't move on to other EC votes until that State is resolved. What does that have to do with State Legislatures or them objecting?
But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of. (-End Section 15-)
To: Svartalfiar
State Legislatures involve the governors by the laws they draft/pass, lol, hence the darn entire process the legislature oversee.
When the process is usurped (2000 example if SCOTUS would of ruled for Gore and allowed the FLSC opinion to stand), State Legislatures use Safe harbor conditions/laws/Constitutional enumerations (Spelled out by the US Code you posted) and via Article II appointment clause select a different set of electors to counteract the flawed process that the Executive or Judicial Branch usurped (FL 2000).
In this election, State Electors via the body as a whole, declared a viable process occurred.
To: Svartalfiar
When a “tie” happens (Split Congressional bodies), they revert to the original process, however, one body could still appeal via safe harbor which becomes a matter for the courts in which the courts would probably not want to touch that problem with a ten foot pole and just revert to current State law.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson