Posted on 12/14/2020 8:26:36 PM PST by White Lives Matter
Thanks for that info, seizethecarp!
It’s another can that got kicked down the road when Barry Hussein was being vetted before the DNC convention in 2008. Everyone knew he was illegitimate to run, but since he was a mulatto(Black enough)... both parties and the ignorant PC culturally brainwashed youth turning voter age at the time saw Barry’s candidacy as a historic symbol of diversity and it would mend a much propagandized non-existent racial divide.
Nobody wanted be called a racist by calling Barry out on his disqualification. So instead they said... “SCREW” the rule of law, and the Constitution can go pound sand.
Yes indeed... the judiciary, pundits and party sentiment felt that giving Barry a pass was symbolically necessary to put to rest America’s white-guilt and the law be damned!
Fast forward to today and we now have COWARDS and brainwashed legal experts carrying the ball of ‘precedent.’ And that somehow allowing Barry to illegitimately assume the presidency as a fraud, a poser, a FAKE... was just fine and dandy because nobody objected. Or at least those that did were ridiculed and shamed as birthers and being RACISTS!
They all hailed with cheers of diversity and that Barry’s presidency magically amended the Constitution, vacating/removing the ‘Natural Born’ requirement because it was willed on principle! That’s funny... the last time I checked the constitution still requires a president to be Natural Born. I guess new updated copies of the constitution haven’t been printed yet with this important amendment added. /s
Nope... no such ‘legal’ precedent by adjudication or by the amendment process has been done. What in fact DID happen was a criminal act... an act that ascends to the level of high treason against the constitution by whomever were complicit in allowing a blatant FRAUD to assume the presidency.
Kamala Harris is no different... she is a fraud, illegitimate and cannot qualify.
Harris is ineligible. She knows it, Biden knows it and the same bozos that gave Barry a pass know it.
And these same treasonous cabal of subversive degenerates believe that nobody will dare object... or you will be called a racist and misogynist.
On top of that you have a huge crop of brainwashed ignoramus deniers descend on you that believe ‘Natural Born’ simply means born here.
If the informed try to raise the issue of Harris’s birth not being ‘Natural Born’ under the original meaning of the constitution and pursuant to the US Naturalization laws... you will be called a ‘Birther’, a conspiracy nut and loon.
The ignorance, stupidity and vacant critical thinking of these deriding assailants is wide and deep.
But I hold my breath that Kamala Harris will be held to the law and have to prove her credentials... and be ultimately denied her candidacy and the rule of law upheld.
There is whispers and talk beginning to percolate in many circles that she will be challenged if needed.
We shall see.
Great post.
PING
Ping to # 124, and also read yesterday's Pings beginning @ # 114.
Thanks, Brown Deer. Hang him and Pelosi who certified 0 was eligible to be President, knowing he was not an American citizen.
So he's damned if he doesn't release a birth certificate and damned if he does?
There are probably more than one version of your birth certificate too, depending on when the certificate was issued.
You are very welcome, WH57! I stirred myself from my torpor to post that.
Don’t be ridiculous. (I know you can’t do that.) No President, who was confident in their citizenship status, would dignify the accusation with any response whatsoever. That is obvious ... to the mentally competent.
As for the two versions, I wasn’t making a point about the validity of either document on that basis. Something you would know if you had ever looked into this subject more than superficially.
As far as those two versions, I know that his first submission to the public was actually a CLB (certificate of live birth) not a BC. The second submission was supposedly a BC. Both were amateurish fakes easily debunked in several ways each.
As for me I have one BC. I don’t have a CLB because you have to request one to get one and I haven’t.
You are very welcome, WH57! I stirred myself from my torpor to post that.
It only matters if we are intent on keeping our country . . . no big deal right? (Massive Sarcasm Alert!!!)
That was what he did for several years. It was taken as evidence that he didn't have a valid birth certificate. So, as I said, he couldn't win either way.
I know that his first submission to the public was actually a CLB (certificate of live birth) not a BC. The second submission was supposedly a BC.
That is a distinction without a difference. The first document was a "Certification of Live Birth" because it was computer generated. The second was a "Certificate of Live Birth" because it was filled out on a typewriter in an earlier time. Both were the state's current version of birth certificates. Neither was a "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" issued to someone whose actual birth was unrecorded.
Both were amateurish fakes easily debunked in several ways each.
The "debunkings" were amateurish. Some by people who expected a manual typewriter to produce computer generated accuracy. Other "debunkings" were just people assuming that the document was obviously fake.
As for me I have one BC. I don’t have a CLB because you have to request one to get one and I haven’t.
Request either or both and see what you get.
Don’t be ridiculous. (I know you can’t do that.) ... That is obvious ... to the mentally competent.
Everything around here is insults nowadays. Sad.
Come on , Man. We already know that answer :-(
You’re full of crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.