Posted on 12/03/2020 7:55:39 PM PST by SeekAndFind
I see the connection to the internet right now (it is an ethernet jack in my wall). It goes offshore to Frankfurt (The internet goes everywhere).
I have made the same assertion as Waldron, with the same amount of evidence. He never ever says he has specific evidence of specific voting machines connecting. His graph is a load of BS. He is a dirtbag because he gives false hope to the less technically literate out there.
If he had anything real, he would have dropped it. He has nothing, so just spewed some FUD and nonsense. Don't buy into his garbage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiFBPjnesZU&feature=emb_logo
00:52 we did observe packet traffic that were 00:56 going 00:57 from the u.s now we don't know if it was 00:59 specifically 01:00 dominion traffic going but to uh to a 01:03 server in frankfurt
we don't know if it was specifically dominion traffic going but to uh to a server in frankfurt
He knows nothing, has nothing, and is wasting people's time.
You THINK it’s fiction. You have no more proof of that than those who say it happened.
“Server” is both a clue and a misnomer. This is the problem.
I am dismissive of this story in the absence of valid details, particularly due to the facts that 1. Trump was (reportedly) in a SCIF on election night, 2. Our government has undisclosed cyber capabilities and has no need to deploy military in a foreign country to secure digital evidence of state crimes, 3. The scope & totality of electoral fraud is probably an order of magnitude greater than reported publicly and remains undisclosed due to active investigation(s).
To believe otherwise leaves me having lost all faith in our system of government, almost where I was 3 weeks ago before the ‘tsunami’ of evidence began rolling out.
I remain ‘hopeful’ that the fraud hearings will continue to expose the scope of local fraud and that the Trump administration only separated from Powell due to national security matters which will only be exposed in an evidentiary hearing at SCOTUS.
“but Gohmert, Giuliani, and Powell have some cred.”
None of them have said it happened.
They only convey “reports” from unnamed sources.
That is exactly what I am saying.
You refer to “national security matters which will only be exposed in an evidentiary hearing at SCOTUS.”
The Supreme Court almost never holds evidentiary hearings. Like other appellate courts in the federal system, and in every state system that I know of, SCOTUS handles appeals, in which the issue is whether a lower court’s decision is correct in light of the factual record that was made before that court. New evidence cannot be introduced on appeal.
The only reason I wrote “almost never” is that the Supreme Court has a very limited original jurisdiction. A border dispute between two states begins at the Supreme Court, which must therefore take evidence.
If Giuliani/Ellis/Powell/Wood want information about a Frankfurt server to be brought to the attention of the Supreme Court, there must be evidence introduced in the court that first hears the case. Evidence means someone with direct personal knowledge. If the witness says only “I heard this from someone whom I consider a reliable source,” that is inadmissible hearsay.
I just did a news recap on this thing and it looks like the whole thing was an utter hoax. Bing and Google have zero credible stories showing it to be authentic.
I’m not saying it IS a hoax, but there is no credible evidence to suggest it isn’t.
Bummer, sort of.
Same reports claim a massive solar flare will cause power outages for 5 days from 16Dec-20Dec20. We’ll see.
(I did see a tremendous meteor this morning.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.