Posted on 11/13/2020 7:16:41 AM PST by jdirt
I’m getting a feeling they hoped to beat Trump via “death by a thousand cuts.” The press is all agaga about the dead voting and that doesn’t even matter that much. Meanwhile, that is not even the main thrust of the Trump legal effort. It’s about the BIG cheating, not the onesy, twoesy stuff. But it all adds up.
And that is the case that may need to be made to the SCOTUS.
A return to in-person, “id required” voting with the occasional REQUESTED absentee ballot being thrown in is what is needed.
Maybe the “purple dye” thing is necessary. :)
It’s true ghost votes do breed
“All the news that” we choose “to print.”
bttt
I am personally involved in 2 lawsuits pertaining to registration fraud in my state.....Any other questions?
What no one seems to be noticing is that none of these claims by itself-—if validated-—would change anything. In MI, 1,400? Out of 146,000?
In other words, it appears that the Trump legal team is basing its strategy on running the table on a dozen “small ball” suits that “might” total enough to flip a state. In AZ, 5,000 isn’t half the margin, and a recount usually nets 200-300, still leaving Trump 5,000 short.
People will jump on me as a “doomer,” but I’m asking a serious question: where specifically does Team Trump plan to find the votes? Because nowhere in their publicly stated strategy are they indicating that this is all part of a giant across-the-board fraud suit based on computer mal-programming.
Happy to be wrong on this.
Patience. What are the penalties? Philly, etc.: all mail in votes are nullified. Wide spread fraud: democrat is disqualified. Backing out fraudulent votes is the minimum exercise.
Now the criminal part: mail fraud (20 years), conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to commit sedition or possibly treason. Democrat Governors, et. al. would be caught up in the conspiracy.
The work mentioned led by Matt Braynard is worthy of support here: https://www.givesendgo.com/voterintegrity (or by contacting Matt directly).
But Gateway Pundit (as is to be expected) overstates or distorts the information in their headline(s).
These numbers represent instances of potential improper/illegal votes by or on behalf of people who may not be legally resident in their voting state.
The cases still need to be (and will be) individually confirmed.
And not all improper votes by people who have moved will be for Biden. Some Trump voters will have voted improperly in their old states’ election.
It is possible they’re trying to build up enough evidence of individual acts of fraud to give state legislatures the political cover to step in. They first need to be able to legitimately say “The vote in our state is so contaminated that there is no way to determine the legitimate winner.”
The point of this particular project is not to find enough to reduce the Biden count below the Trump count, but enough to justify or support the inference that the election is seriously flawed, taken together with the illegalities in the process.
And the categories reported in the GP article are just a first look at some key categories. The project is casting a much wider net to detect potential fraud—visit the link https://www.givesendgo.com/voterintegrity and watch the linked video to understand.
On the other hand, if no significant fraud is detectable, the project will also publicize that finding. Either way, people want and need to know.
The main potential problem not addressed by this project is computer / digital manipulation of results, which also must be pursued.
Comments by Trump and Lin Wood, one of his primary attorneys, indicate that the computer facilitated fraud is the heart of their case, with a projected series of court filings to begin soon. What looks like delay from the outside is actually a sign of Trump and his attorneys keeping their mouths shut while working furiously to get their claims and proof ready for court and the public.
Again I wish people wouldn’t link to Gateway Pundit. The headlines are intended to be provocative clickbait and rarely reflect the actually facts.
Maybe. Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit is extremely upset Team Trump doesn’t seem to be taking any of the massive evidence submitted by grassroots activists.
And the clock is ticking, loudly.
That should precisely be the strategy, but a thousand non-signatures here, a thousand out-of-state voters there won’t do it in an election with millions of voters.
Sure you are.
p
Democrats: If it didn’t happen on camera, we deny it happened.
And sometimes even those things caught on camera.
Hyperbolic cynicism.....Now intimating a fellow Freeper is a liar.
You are some piece of work.
In Arizona I have read that the main Republican hope now rests on about 9000-10000 provisional ballots, of which (so it was reported) most are expected to be for trump. furthermore my (limited) understanding of provisional ballots in general is that they can override earlier cast ballots by the same person. So, say a person originally voted for Biden, but got caught up in the late cresting MAGA fever, and changed his or her mind. He or she could then cast another provisional ballot and vote for Trump instead of Biden— at least in Arizona.
Folks who actually live in Arizona or who are well versed in Arizona voting law are welcome to correct me if i am wrong. I’m just reporting what I read or heard somewhere (not sure exactly where) earlier this morning.
Also, at least in theory, Arizona could be used strategically as a skirmish area to drag Democrat legal resources away from the other (more promising?) swing states.
Long shot. Trump wouldn’t in the best of all worlds get 9,000 of those votes. Maybe 5,000.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.