Trump isn't secretly winking at QAnon. He's retweeting its followers.

Politico ^

[TruthWillWin]

Anyone with an unbiased open mind reading this article will see this as a huge Q proof.

Trump retweeting Qanon followers, Eric Trump posting giant Q, Dan Scavino facebook post with Q symbology, Nunes directing people to The Dirty Truth (huge Q promoter), Flynn video of himself taking Q loyalty pledge; all this with barely any pushback from Trump or Republican leaders.

Becoming more difficult every week to be a Q denier.

[stylin19a]

thanks...

Powell's interview with the Washington Examiner

“The slogan comes from an engraved bell on JFK'S sailboat — acknowledging the unity of mankind. The oath is obvious — the federal oath in support of our Constitution. He wanted to encourage people to think about being a citizen. Don't read anything else into it," she told the Washington Examiner."

she was wrong about JFK, but she's right about Flynn not having knowledge of Qanon ?
and regardless of what you assume, Powell never quoted Flynn... nor did she even allude to Flynn telling her that.

The problem is, I don't know what the exact question was asked...but her answer doesn't mention Q-Anon, though I am guessing Qanon was mentioned in the question.

I am going to assume she is protecting her client...because...us Qloons

TPM says she emailed them this:

"Powell subsequently told TPM in an email that “Neither of us knows Q or Qanon or follows anyone because of that, but we appreciate our Constitution, American Exceptionalism, Americans’ can-do spirit, American culture, the importance of our freedoms, liberty, and the Rule of Law.” The www makes liars of us all...

FreeRegards

[little jeremiah]

Okrapoker’s mission does not involve doing any research or discerning fact from fiction.

But I’m sure you know that. ;-)

[Revolutionary]

Short answer: Q is a worldwide movement for freedom and justice.

[MNDude]

“Anyone with an unbiased open mind reading this article will see this as a huge Q proof.
Trump retweeting Qanon followers, Eric Trump posting giant Q, Dan Scavino facebook post with Q symbology, Nunes directing people to The Dirty Truth (huge Q promoter), Flynn video of himself taking Q loyalty pledge; all this with barely any pushback from Trump or Republican leaders.

Becoming more difficult every week to be a Q denier.”

Know what’s going to happen? In a few weeks, the President or someone close to him will make another even stronger affirmation of Q, yet the deniers will chalk it up as just another coincidence.

[MNDude]

Wow!!

Just hours after my post “expect another Q proof” soon.

Jeff Sessions is now quoting Q!

https://twitter.com/jeffsessions/status/1282744268759674881?s=19

[Okeydoker]

Thanks for the update

[DAR]

In the video of the Flynn pledge they hand signaled for #17.
Look closely you will see it.Just fyi.

[rx]

I think you would do well to temper your flailing around with your "conspiracy theorist" moniker.

You should know, that despite that there may be some in your acquaintance that may follow your lead after you've dropped that pejorative, immediately being OK'd to think of your referents as eccentric knuckle-draggers, use of that "turd in the punchbowl" by no means takes the place of evidence and reasoned debate for knowledgeable company, especially around these parts.

You'll do well in the future to back up your controversial slams against accomplished people with at least a modicum of evidence if not proof before you may think you've advanced a solid argument.

Although the weight of all the Mainstream Media (MSM) came down to deny President Trump's claim on March 4, 2017--that you even now derisively call a "conspiracy of the deep state"--that he and his associates been wiretapped (Title I, we now know, SIGINT and HUMINT), many of us noted those huge denials came on the heels of what could only have been zero investigation beyond making a phone call or getting a return email from their well-placed government leakers. Brian Stelter of CNN called Trump's claim an "incendiary idea." The "[T]he entire [MSM] attempted to dismiss at the time as a “conspiracy theory” to mock Trump and to protect Obama, but it should have known PDJT would have done more investigation and had access to supremely better methods of verification than what they could ever have done. Indeed he had. In brief, even CNN came along before long with published admission that associates at Trump Tower had indeed been wiretapped by Barry. Now, via notes from the 1/4/2017 meeting with Comey, Biden, Barry, Rice, et al., in the Oval, we know even more how Barry directed Comey to get the right people on the investigation, which included the Title I for LTG Flynn and Carter Page--at least! Thus, please take back your uninformed slam--or was it uninformed?

As a second example, you also make a mistake to imply Barry's birth certificate was somehow authentic and valid and PDJT's belief that it wasn't shows him and LTG Flynn to be "Kooky conspiracy theorists." Again, you couldn't be further from the truth. There are many facts that prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Barry's (Long Form) Birth Certificate (LFBC) was the result of (a largely CIA) conspiracy to produce that forged, invalid document. Barry's waffeling claims and behavior around most things surrounding that LFBC serve to confirm its fraudulent production.

Barry was Constitutionally ineligible to be President. Had he been eligible, Barry would have had no need or motivation to have the intelligence community (Brennan, Clapper, Dennis Montgomery, "Loretta Fuddy," Alvin T. Onaka, Robert F. Bauer, etc.) procure a falsified Certificate of Live Birth and years later, a LFBC to present the latter to the public in a TV extravaganza and to a White House Press Corps event to which the invited audience were not allowed to bring in any cameras. There are plenty of reasons that last would be the case.

Only a few days after presentation of the LFBC, Barry used his entire Hollywood-and-campaign presentation to the assembled White House Correspondents Dinner guests to hammer The Donald about his skepticism concerning the LFBC. The Donald, had in the few months before, engaged in a media tour where he repeatedly questioned why Barry hadn't shown his LFBC. That tour could possibly have been seen as a kick-off to a presidential candidacy bid, but certainly, after the ridicule hurled at that dinner, it was not to be. The Donald at that time didn't not have proof of the fraud and he would have been foolhardy to act as if he had.

But when document sleuths, both professional and amateur, saw a mounting number of indicia of fraud in Barry's LFBC and were commanding headlines about it, Barry chose that moment—after almost a year of delay of claimed knowledte of bin Laden's Pakistani hideout—to send a helicopter-borne spec ops mission to go after the purported 9/11 mastermind, removing in coordinated fashion with the captured MSM the LFBC issues from front pages across the US. Three months after Biden betrayed which elite soldiers were sent on the Abbottabad, Pakistan raid, most of Seal Team Six lay dead southwest of Kabul, amid the aftermath of an RPG hit to a lumbering CH-47D call-signed Extortion 17 that was denied adequate support, directly as ordered in real-time from the Pentagon, under the oversight of Admiral McRaven.

Barry also used the US Navy, the USCG, the FAA and the NTSB to carry out a hoax that would remove CIA asset “Loretta Fuddy” from public scrutiny on 12/11/2013, pretending she had died in the aftermath of a hoaxed commuter aircraft emergency ditching onto the waters 1/4 mile off the Kalaupapa Peninsula of Moloka’i, Hawai’i.

(If you didn't notice the links embedded above--as seen by underlined text--you would do well to check out all of them.)

[delchiante]

Thanks for the evidence.
I hope you re-read that post again where I was defending Trump and Flynn because the ‘conspiracies’ aren’t theories after all..
They are proof that Trump knows what he is talking about, and I used just a couple events media call ‘conspiracy’ as a weapon to highlight that Flynn and Trump are the exact opposite of kooky conspiracy theorists..

Didn’t think I needed to place the sarc next to it. I guess I was wrong.

I actually look forward to the trafficking ‘conspiracy’ that Trump leveled at Hillary to be revealed at some point.
Trump has a way of saying something he already knows the answer to..

Sorry for the confusion

[rx]

I’ve seen many situations where people’s subtlety of intent get lost in their written word that I usually look hard for a clear indication in writing such as your first comment here. I don’t know that I’d ever seen you post, so I also lacked historical background.

Even still, rereading your post in light of what you followed up with didn’t make clear to me that it was sarcasm. Oh, well. That happens.

The WWG1WGA is supposedly engraved into a bell on a sailing ship that was featured in a movie, if I recall correctly. The motto was very significant to the sailors’ success in that movie, I gather.

Carry on with my well wishes!