Posted on 04/27/2020 10:39:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
there is no data upon which we can have a rational discussion
sorry
that’s the sad reality
pings
Rational discussion is not everyone's goal.
no kidding
“it was REFERRED to.”
no, it was stolen: nearly everything in that GP article,including the graphs, were copied directly from the Inproportion article ... it’s what Jim Hoft ALWAYS does ... as far as i’m concerned, he’s a scumbag leaching off of the work of others, and i would love to see a class action lawsuit against the SOB ...
Again, the article did say VIA InProportion before it showed the graph.
See here:
The “Via Inproportion” came after these lines:
________________________________
Draconian lockdowns were not considered necessary back then.
And the previous flu outbreaks hit children and young adults.
________________________________
Have a look yourself by clicking the link I provided.
doesn’t matter that they say “via” or whatever or include a link, they STILL stole the story by copying it, which is basically what 99% of what GP does: *COPY* other peoples’ hard work!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.