Posted on 01/05/2020 5:14:11 AM PST by vg0va3
what are the chances the numbers get skewed when polling the blt@dq and transmission communities...
Great point. Thanks for adding that comment.
Let me provide some of the small donor data for you to consider.
Here are the $200-$499 female contributions:
Trump- 14,953
Bernie- 12,480
Biden- 4,682
Warren- 14,779
Little Peter- 8,159
I look at that number (27,259 socialist v. 12,841 socialist lite) and believe that the actual number of voter are big on socialism.
That leads me believe the Warren or Bernie will be the Democrat nominee.
There is a reason why Silicon Valley became predominantly male. It’s not that women don’t want high paying jobs, it’s that women don’t like the globalist race to the bottom that will disadvantage almost everyone. Whatever Democrat the Dems pick, that is the track they are on. The proggies are the sneakier path, Biden is basically a continuation of Obama, and Mayor Pete and Yang are full on welcome-corporate-overlords.
Most women are populists at heart. We just want to know what we are dealing with (the rules of the road) and we are not fond of an utter lack of privacy. Being able to take a pee should not involve protracted negotiations with the pronoun police. Trump is the only populist is the 2020 race. I think you can pop your popcorn because this is going to be a very entertaining race.
The reason why more women have been Democrats in the past is because women tend to be populists. The Paul Ryan’s and Justin Amash’s of the world made it nearly impossible for Republicans to appeal to the female vote, but both of them are gone. Trump is taking back the GOP, and the closest thing the Democrats have to a populist is Bernie Sanders who is an old commie with a track record for praising tyrants. The Democrats have got to be terrified of the sea change that will happen if they don’t take out President Trump.
I think you grossly underestimate the number of people of all colors and genders (of which there are only TWO) that are sick and damn' tired of the militant gay lgbtqrstuvwxyz agenda being shoved in our faces every f'n day.
The problem is that he is a focus grouped flavor of the day weak candidate.
We moderately agree here. Weak candidate, yes. He says what everyone wants to hear. Focus grouped? I can't say. He's one of those "I'll say whatever the person in front of me wants to hear, in order to make them like me" kind of guys. Of that I'm 1,000% sure.
Everybody knows he will be a puppet for the scumbags who nearly destroyed us all.
He's a militant homosexual who misquotes Gods word as it suits his own personal needs/agenda to bash Christians and anyone who doesn't agree with him. He's no puppet.
Both of whom would be soundly crushed by President Trump.
Just face facts: the Democrats don't have a candidate capable of beating President Trump, period.
I tend to agree with you — IF Fauxcahontas or Bernie eventually drop out.
However, if both stubbornly remain in the race — ala Gingrich/Santorum — then Sleepy Jo will probably win by default — ala Romney.
Focus grouped. I think the donors are looking at Buttigieg’s sexual orientation as a vote getter.
I didn’t say they were any good at it, they are amazingly arrogant in projecting on the rest of us appeals that use the sin of pride as the payoff for supporting an unqualified and thoroughly incompetent candidate. Not avoiding sin, no, sin is the actual payoff! So do something you don’t want to do that you know is a stupid thing to do and as a reward you will get a spot on your soul, yay! What could be better than that?! /sarc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.