Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Psychiatrist: Pelosi Can Subject Trump to 'Involuntary' Evaluation
Breitbart ^ | 12/27/19 | Nate Church

Posted on 12/28/2019 9:03:58 AM PST by Impala64ssa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last
To: justa-hairyape
pot-calling-the-kettle-black-2

121 posted on 12/28/2019 7:34:59 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: timestax

Precisely. Its not the President holding up a joke of an impeachment trial. Pelosi wants to make sure she has the votes before giving it to the Senate. They never vote until they know they will get the desired outcome.


122 posted on 12/28/2019 9:13:10 PM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

Her eyes have an empty stare which remind me of other North Koreans’ empty expressions.


123 posted on 12/28/2019 9:25:22 PM PST by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine, education and our forests)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Better idea - evaluate her, Nancy, Adam, Biden, Warren and a host of others....maybe they would reopen a few mental institutions...


124 posted on 12/29/2019 3:30:03 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
shumer-Palousy
125 posted on 12/29/2019 10:49:03 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Glenmore

The problem is that THERE IS NO SUCH PROVISION IN THE CONSTITUTION FOR REMOVING A PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE. The ONLY ONLY ONLY venues for such activity are 1) impeachment and 2) the 25th amendment.
Those are the only legal avenues, PERIOD. All the caterwauling and wailing and dust throwing nonsense about “this would apply to anyone” is simply forbidden. It might apply to anyone ELSE, but is forbidden in our legal structure. This is not to say judges somewhere would never rule unconstitutionally (smile), but that is precisely the kind of ruling they would have to make, and would likely face a bullet in the face from a VERY irate group of deplorables for doing so. I don’t think they would risk it unless it was a sure thing. Progressives aren’t known for being very courageous nor principled.


126 posted on 12/29/2019 10:50:51 AM PST by mostly_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Separation of powers, and the 25th amendment, say the psycho-atrist is wrong.


127 posted on 03/12/2020 8:48:48 AM PDT by MortMan (Shouldn't "palindrome" read the same forward and backward?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson