If New Paul Sperry Report About Whistleblower Is True, It’s A Game Changer

RedState ^ | October 4, 2019 | Elizabeth Vaughn

[Sivad]

Demo M/O = infiltrate, overtake, politicize, weaponize.

[GreyFriar]

So much for the secrecy oaths we took and believed in as military intelligence soldiers. I guess the CIA is exempt.

[FamiliarFace]

What is the law that you think Trump broke?

[Cold War Veteran - Submarines]

Barr got the goods in his trips. Timing and urgency of this whole farce are to aligned to be a coincidence

[OKSooner]

"If this story is true, it offers further evidence that Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who currently chairs the House Intelligence Committee, is an unscrupulous, deceitful manipulator who has caused great harm to our country. He should immediately be stripped of his chairmanship and thrown off the Intelligence Committee. It’s time for this liar to face justice."

Nah... I just now un-typed some stuff...

[Chauncey Gardiner]

Starting with Schiff, a loose theory is this is a network of angry poofters on the loose...

[axxmann]

CIA decided Ukraine needed to be removed from Russia’s control and brought into Western control, by any means.

I’m not disagreeing but why did they let Russia annex Crimea?

[ETCM]

Seems quite likely that Sperry knows the identity of the “whistleblower”. Sperry also knows the risk of revealing the name, not just to his career, but to his freedom. Remember “PlameGate”? Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald? Remember what happened to Scooter Libbey, when he was suspected of outing Valerie Plame? He wasn’t even guilty, and everyone in the DC “cocktail circuit” knew Plame was a CIA Agent. But Libby was convicted of “process crimes” and locked up in prison.

So, obviously, Sperry needs to be careful here, or he will be find himself standing in front of a judge and jury, and possibly behind bars.

[ctdonath2]

I don’t think he did.

I was addressing the “blows up” comment, which implied that the case relies on something other than objective legal guilt. The Left’s narrative may suffer, because it’s not based on objective legal guilt, but the reality of actual impeachment won’t because it requires at least articulation of a crime and presentation of evidence reasonably supporting the accusation; just because somebody mishandled the narrative doesn’t derail impeachment.

[JohnnyP]

A thread here last night had the name Ned Price, an ex CIA poofter.

[FamiliarFace]

Ok thanks. I wasn’t sure what you had meant, which is why I asked. I’m glad I did. Your reply cleared up my confusion.

[1Old Pro]

of course this is true

[Texas resident]

Las Vegas also.

[thinden]

So much for the secrecy oaths we took and believed in as military intelligence soldiers. I guess the CIA is exempt.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C_A are not military & their only loyalty is to themselves.