Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Weaponized the FBI?
Canada Free Press ^ | 04/09/17 | Dr. Robert Owens

Posted on 04/09/2019 8:33:51 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Sean_Anthony

How many millions of $$$$$ were spent on this dog & pony show???


21 posted on 04/09/2019 10:43:40 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

Thank you.


22 posted on 04/09/2019 2:36:12 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1; DesertRhino

The truth is that it is intrinsically corruptible: A Federal police force is unConstitutional.


23 posted on 04/09/2019 2:38:27 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony; bitt
The beginning of this sordid chapter in American History is almost laughable.

What's completely laughable is Dr. Robert Owens missed mentioning the counterintelligence/FISA investigation that preceded the election.
He needs to go back to that point, at the least, to get to "the beginning".

Starting with events that happened after the election is disingenuous on his part.

24 posted on 04/09/2019 2:41:37 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony; bitt
This comment in the body of the article... He also added that “There are three [referrals] that I think are more complicated‚ "We believe there was a conspiracy to lie to the FISA court, mislead the FISA court by numerous individuals that all need to be investigated and looked at, and we believe the [relevant] statute is the conspiracy statute. The second conspiracy one is involving manipulation of intelligence that also could ensnarl many Americans.” Why would he imply it all started after the election when that comment in the body of the article alone shows that it didn't?
25 posted on 04/09/2019 2:48:55 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson