Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry says Hillary's loss her OWN fault because she 'incensed' Putin by comparing him to Hitler
The London Daily Mail ^ | June 1, 2018 | Daniel Bates

Posted on 06/02/2018 12:21:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

The left will say anything to perpetuate the myth of Russian meddling. It’s a team effort on the dems part.


21 posted on 06/02/2018 12:36:41 PM PDT by Bullish (government=overfunded stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
p07
22 posted on 06/02/2018 12:51:36 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
So... Hillary was doing great until she pissed off Putin.

... and then he interfered with the elections and colluded with Trump.

Uh..huh.

23 posted on 06/02/2018 12:52:38 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Kerry confuses insight with delusion.


24 posted on 06/02/2018 12:54:11 PM PDT by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
<><>Investors Business Daily reported huge foreign contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all such donors."

<><>The Dallas office of the IRS's investigation into Clinton Foundation public filings found missing disclosures concerning foundation donations from foreign governments. Other glaring discrepancies should have triggered payment of substantial fines, penalties, and interest to government treasuries long ago.

================================

nypost.com

Then-NYAG Eric Schneiderman Let Clinton Foundation skip identifying foreign donors
By Bob Fredericks September 6, 2016 | 9:37pm

State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the Clinton Foundation a pass on identifying foreign donors in its charitable filings — making it impossible to know if it got any special favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, according to a report Tuesday.

Scripps News found that the foundation and its subsidiary, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, took in $225 million in government donations between 2010 and 2014. New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.” But both the foundation and the CHAI failed to do that, and Schneiderman, a member of Clinton’s “leadership council” in New York and a fierce critic of Donald Trump, did nothing about it.

On its website, the Clinton Foundation reveals its foreign donors, but using only broad ranges, such as $5 million to $10 million, without any time frames. The IRS doesn’t require such disclosures.In 2009, Clinton’s first year at the State Department, the foundation disclosed a lump sum of $122 million in foreign-government donations in its New York paperwork, posting the total amount on a form that requires all charities to “list each government contribution separately.”

Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin said, “This is a ridiculous accusation. The Clinton Foundation goes above and beyond the disclosure requirements by listing every donor on their website and updating the list quarterly.” Schneiderman’s office said, “The Clinton Foundation’s disclosures regarding funding from foreign governments are in compliance with New York law.”

Other charities complied, including the George W. Bush foundation, which reported receiving $5 million from Saudi Arabia and $500,000 from Kuwait.

Hillary and the smirking Eric Schneiderman (right).
E/S was recently ousted from office after charges he spat at,
choked and slapped women he was intimate with.

25 posted on 06/02/2018 12:55:25 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This guy is a such an effin moron. No, she lost you Lurch looking idiot because:

#1 She’s a criminal and everyone knows it. Liberals just don’t seem to care but the majority of people with sane minds DO care.

#2 She sat on her fat cankle supported ass her entire campaign thinking she would easily win while Trump was out there 24/7 busting his butt. I can’t remember one interview or rally she ever did.

#3. Besides having the personality of a dead stump, she had absolutely ZERO message.

RUSSIANS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!


26 posted on 06/02/2018 12:56:10 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Vox populi, vox dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Of all the spurious excuses she gives for her loss, the most ludicrous is that
Hillary says she lost her "sure-thing election" because "Putin doesn't like me."
Comey sucked up--told Congress Putin wanted to “harm Hillary.”

Hillary once bragged that she, alone, was brought into Putin's inner sanctum
where she assured Putin she was worried about wildlife like he was.

Putin whispered to an attentive Hilary that they were BFF.

Secy Hillary and Obama were eager to please Russia w/ the friendly reset button.
Hillary later said the reset gambit was Obama's and her idea "to strengthen Russia."

==============================================

Ex-Pres Clinton is s-o-o-o-o friendly he traveled to Russia to clinch the uranium giveaway deal.
And to pocket a $500,000 dollar speaking fee from a Moscow bank plus a sizeable commission.

Billybooboo even laid his "Hot Damn Hokey Hillbilly Act" on Putin.

27 posted on 06/02/2018 12:57:49 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How do you hack America? Idiotic.


28 posted on 06/02/2018 12:58:29 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
On March 6, 2009, during a trip to Geneva, Hillary presented Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov a small, red button. Halfrican Obama, and Secy Hillary thought it was emblazoned with the Russian word for “reset.” The button actually read “overload.” Nonetheless, Clinton and Lavrov jointly pressed the symbolic button. A new era in US–Russian relations had begun.

THE OBAMA/HILLARY RUSSIAN LOVE AFFAIR---While visiting Moscow on March 24, 2010, Secy Hillary explained the Reset Button’s purpose: “Our goal (meaning Obama and the State Dept) is to help strengthen Russia.”

================================= No need to ask Obama and Clinton about their Russian connections-----the paper trail is long and wide.

EXCERPT The taxpayer financed-Skolkovo Scandal – While serving as secretary of state, Clinton oversaw a program meant to “reset” relations with Moscow and improve ties. The program centered around the Russian city of Skolkovo near Moscow with the stated aim of “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the American and Russian people.”

Hillary's State Dept program transformed Skolkovo into a technology hub akin to a Silicon Valley. Sensitive American technology was transferred to the Russians, substantially enhancing their military and cyber capabilities. The US Army and the FBI concluded that Russia had exploited the program for military applications. The FBI warned American technology companies doing business in Skolkovo that the Skolkovo project was a means by which the Russians would acquire dual use technologies and apply them for military ends. According to investigative author Peter Schweizer, Russian and American companies and individuals involved in the Skolkovo fiasco “had major financial ties to the Clintons.”

Moreover, during the Russian reset period, those entities provided the Clintons with “tens of millions of dollars” in the form of “contributions to the Clinton Foundation, paid for speeches by Bill Clinton, or investments in small start-up companies with deep Clinton ties.” (hat tip frontpagemagazine.com By Ari Lieberman)

29 posted on 06/02/2018 1:00:57 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Every perv it seems has had a photo op with Hitlery. Schneiderman, Weinstein, Louis CK, Kevin Spacey, Anthony Weiner, I think they gravitate towards her because she was known for protecting sex offenders. Read Ann Coulters new column, she talks about this. It was a freakin Mafiosa protection racket for pervs......

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-05-30.html#read_more


30 posted on 06/02/2018 1:02:36 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Vox populi, vox dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just curious, who was the Secretary of state while all this election interference was going on? Why was he not in talks with his Russian counterparts to stop it?

Because, we all know, he also thought Hillary was going to win. LMAO.


31 posted on 06/02/2018 1:02:41 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dear Democrat as$holes,

Putin had nothing to do with anything.

KTHXBYE


32 posted on 06/02/2018 1:06:05 PM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

33 posted on 06/02/2018 1:06:09 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (We're even doing the right thing for them. They just don't know it yet. --Donald Trump, CPAC '18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Another enlightened Theory by that Beacon of Brilliance, John F kerrey. The only possibility that these people do not see is that their candidate flat-out sucked. And people hated her. And people distrusted her. And people were offended by her. And they looked carefully and they saw that in her lifetime she had achieved absolutely nothing other than damage, theft, murder and the destruction of a couple of countries.

Nevertheless, I am extremely grateful for the utter inability of these people to see the truth, no matter how obvious it is. It’s quite remarkable and gives me great confidence that we will obliterate them next election.


34 posted on 06/02/2018 1:07:16 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Clintoon lost the election because she believed Jimmy Comey and the leftwing “mainstream media” convince her that the fix was in and she had the presidency in the bag.


35 posted on 06/02/2018 1:08:18 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

LOL

That pic says it all!


36 posted on 06/02/2018 1:08:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: euram

I am not that certain that it was the laziest campaign. I suspect she put everything she had into the campaign...which points out how incapable she really was and is.

I would be very surprised if she was even coherent by 2019...or even alive. Drugs and exoskeletons can only do so much.


37 posted on 06/02/2018 1:10:57 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (The Democrats in California want another civil war over cheap labor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: euram

I am not that certain that it was the laziest campaign. I suspect she put everything she had into the campaign...which points out how incapable she really was and is.

I would be very surprised if she was even coherent by 2019...or even alive. Drugs and exoskeletons can only do so much.


38 posted on 06/02/2018 1:10:58 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (The Democrats in California want another civil war over cheap labor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Thanks for the link. And remember when Clinton was in the Lewinsky sex mess....look who bailed him out.

Hollyweirdos rallied around Clinton to fund his lewinsky sex mess defense fund. Herewith, for your edification, are the Certified Democrat Degenerates......the scum that vilify and destroy America's Judeo-Christian ethics and values in movies promoted as being "diverse, politically correct, and socially relevant."

HOLLYWOOD'S CERTIFIED DEMOCRAT DEGENERATES
FINANCED BILL CLINTON'S LEWINSKY SEX MESS

According to FEC Info, an Internet Web site (www.tray.com) that tracks federal political contributions, 176 individual donors actually contributed $10,000 or more to the lewinsky-era Clinton Legal Expense Trust fund through Dec 1999. Another 21 donors gave $10,000 in the first six months of 2000.

Thanks to Hollywood's generosity, a total of more than $2.2 million was raised in six months, which was notably more than was collected in funding during the previous four years of his presidency—combined. Hollywood producers and stars made up the bulk of the most generous givers. They included:

<><> Universal Studios tycoon Lew Wasserman and his wife, Edith, who have given $60,000;

<><>DreamWorks trio Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, $20,000 each;

<><> producer Ron Burkle and his wife, Janet, $40,000;

<><> producers Peg and Bud Yorkin, $30,000;

<><> TV producer Norman Lear, $20,000.

Entertainment celebrities and executives giving $10,000 included:

<><> singers Tony Bennett and Barbra Streisand;

<><> actors Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks;

<><> director Ron Howard; producer Gail Zappa;

<><>Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson.

======================================

When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandal—Harvey Weinstein.

Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. That’s small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year. Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2) Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.

Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.

Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?

========================================

How did the Hollywood elite list payments to Clinton's sex defense fund on their tax returns?
How did publicly-traded companies list their donations on shareholder reports?

<><>How did the "DreamWorks" trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton's sex defense fund?

<><>How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?

<><> Did Harvey's company list these payments as "business expenses?"

The biggie is the tax element.

<><> Did donors deduct it as a “business expense”,

<><> was it included in assets, payments listed on organization balance sheets as a "liability?"

<><> Did Clinton document it as "income"?

<><> Were the donors given a tax-free certificate from the Clinton Foundation?

39 posted on 06/02/2018 1:11:22 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I think I could find a Sanderista or three that would disagree.


40 posted on 06/02/2018 1:13:37 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson