Posted on 02/19/2018 10:16:08 AM PST by Armen Hareyan
Source, please? And please, not someone's blog.
.
OK, obviously you are selectively aware.
.
If this animal study applies to humans, the opposite would be true. LAIV vaccination would both increase the number of bacteria the vaccinated carry, and would prolong their carriage time -- and hence transmissibility -- for 28 days or longer after administration. This is in addition to the fact that even the FluMist live vaccine insert provides ample evidence that the vaccine can infect the recipient with an infectious form of influenza that can be shed to others as long as three weeks after receiving it. They also pointed out that, while they did not find evidence of harm, there is reason to be concerned: "The potent and often lethal effects of an antecedent influenza virus infection on secondary bacterial disease have been reported previously (11, 21, 44–46). Viral replication induced epithelial and mucosal degradation, and the ensuing innate immune response yield diminished capacity to avert secondary bacterial infections. Recent clinical and experimental data suggest that influenza virus infection may exert its influence beginning in the URT by enhancing susceptibility to bacterial colonization (14, 47, 48) and increasing NP carriage density (36).
The main implication of this study is that, "live attenuated viral vaccines may have unintended consequences on important human bacterial pathogens unrelated to the vaccine target species." In fact, this study may explain concerning side effects associated with the FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine that traditionally have been attributed to the vaccine virus itself - and not to secondary bacterial infections it may elicit.
It MAY, but it also MAY NOT. IF it is so means that it also MAY NOT be so.
Bottom line: Proof over supposition.
Forgot: source is GreenMedinfo. Looks like a blog- sorry. But remember GREEN is the new RED!
.
What you “found” is just more bafflegab smoke screening in search of grant money.
The sorcerer’s apprentice will never accidentally find a tool to lengthen life, while working for those seeking wealth while persuing the global goal of destroying it.
If we want the path to health, we’ve always had it, but now have made it literally unlawful for a licensed practitioner to utilize it.
.
Valid points & agreed for reasons about which I’m not elaborating today...
I can tell--reading comprehension is not your strong point. What I have said, repeatedly, is that if a blood test done at birth (at the time that a battery of blood tests are performed) can show whether or not a child is autistic, then why on earth would you subject the child repeatedly to more blood tests for autism? That is utterly cruel, and will not "prove" what you want to prove.
If the kid has a positive test for autism at birth, then other testing (not blood tests) would need to be done to confirm the diagnosis. If the kid tests negative, then how many times do you want to subject that kid to blood tests? Why not just drain all of his blood?
So compare them
Cruel to do a blood test to confirm a diagnosis? Please stop already
If a doc thought your toddler was autistic you’d have access to a blood test to confirm rather than waiting years to start interventions
Once again, your lack of reading comprehension shows clearly. If your infant tests positive for biomarkers of autism at birth, you'll want to start interventions immediately. Who is saying that you would wait and wait for years after the kid has already tested positive? I sure as heck didn't say that.
I am one of a legion of parents whose kids were affected with symptoms and deteriorating behaviors within hours or days of vax
A huge number of “ coincidences”
Now that you scientists can clear away suspicions with simple blood tests - I don’t get it with the resistance
Oh wait
Yes I do
There is no way to be delicate here, so I probably shouldn't even try. You were reading up for years about this imaginary link between autism and vaccines. The fact that millions of dollars were wasted trying to verify that non-existent link means nothing to you. The fact that the "doctor" who published the imaginary link between vaccines and autism committed fraud in search of profit means nothing to you. The fact that signs of autism show up within a certain age range regardless of vaccination status means nothing to you. You want to believe that vaccines somehow cause autism because a child whose autistic behavior becomes evident has always received at least one vaccine within the last few months (if his parents are following the vaccine schedule), and you have no understanding of the concept that correlation does not equal causation. You just want to blame some exterior factor for the fact that YOU passed aberrant genes to your child that caused autism. Well, vaccines were not the source of the aberrant genes that caused your child's brain not to develop properly. YOU were the source of those genes.
Your understanding of brain development and your understanding of how vaccines work are both nearly nonexistent. Try to learn a little about both before you try to scare parents into leaving their children susceptible to potentially lethal diseases because your kid has a genetic disorder.
Are you indicating that you are unaware?
Anti-vaxxers are trying to eliminate people by scaring parents into refusing to vaccinate their children against deadly diseases.
At this time, polio and measles are nearly eradicated thanks to vaccines. You, apparently, want to bring them back. Do you also want to dig out a few vials of smallpox to spread around, since the medical community actually was successful in eliminating smallpox with vaccines?
Until maybe a decade ago, infectious diseases were the #1 killer. They still are in the top ten. While anti-vaxxers would love to bring them back to that #1 spot, the medical community stands against that goal.
.
Vaccinations as they are prepared today are attempted murder.
Polio in the US was brought in by the Salk vaccine in the mid ‘50s. I had numerous friends who were victims of that criminal vaccine.
I had all of the well known “childhood diseases” and survived quite well. The “medical community” profits from promoting disease, thus vaccines proliferate, and pharmaceutical poisons take lives early in increasing numbers thanks to the fools captured by TV advertising.
Keep on promoting the death culture.
.
Measles still kills tens of thousands of children per year. According to the WHO, measles vaccines prevented 20.4 million deaths from 2000-2016.
If you had your way, no child would ever be vaccinated again, and the deaths from measles would skyrocket. If you had your way, we’d go right back to the days when most children died before the age of five.
Someone is promoting the death culture here, and it is not me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.