Posted on 02/01/2018 7:22:11 AM PST by Sopater
I want to grasp what happened to get this special consul on Russia meddling. So on weak claims that Russia interfered, meaning leaked the fact Hillary was incompetent and crooked, the Justice Department decided to appoint Mueller to investigate?
So why has the AG never looked into another foreign entity, George Soros, and his election interference?
And wouldn’t the first thing the consul want to do is ask for testimony from Julianne Assange? I mean effectively it is his testimony ultimately Democrats are calling into question. Assange insists that Wikileaks got the email news on Hillary from a non-state actor. So if they are calling him a liar, shouldn’t they offer an interview with him?
Call this question naïve, has Mueller uncovered anything to suggest Assange lied?
This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to look into the entire DOJ/FBI fiasco. The politicians can just release information, which the other side will spin - with the eager assistance of the MSM. A special prosecutor can go after some small fish and get them to cut a deal to rat out their superiors.
“You’re correct. However, I’d like to remind everyone that Gowdy had also said that he had enough evidence for indictments regarding Benghazi, but that really amounted to nothing.”
Yeah, Trey Gowdy is the kind of guy who could tell me it was sunny without a cloud in the sky and I would still take my umbrella.
I lost confidence in him after the Benghazi fizzle.
He seemed like all show and no go.
Too.Much.Hype.
Bingo! He has a proven track record and balls of steel bigger than basketballs. Bring in Arpaio to help him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.