Posted on 09/09/2017 9:49:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Wasn’t there some talk when the Clintons were in the White House, that Hillary talked to Eleanor Roosevelt, talked to her portraits, had imaginary conversations with Eleanor?
Hillary has a faith? A faith in the Bible, in Jesus?
I thought her “Bible” was “Rules For Radicals” by Saul Alinsky.
I thought she worships Saul, not Jesus.
Off topic, but you can tell media bias sometimes by subjects which they ignore. The media have steadfastly ignored the fact that both Hillary and Obama were acolytes of Saul Alinsky.
That’s what I remember reading at the time. And there was a story about her having a seance. But that was so long ago. It seems like it would had to have happened in the early years of the Clinton presidency. But I don’t remember.
But Im worried. Im worried that we face a continuing deliberate effort to undermine our values and our institutions as Americans, and it is something we cannot stay silent about or stay on the sidelines about.
This is her take on the fact that she lost an election? this means that American values, what ever that means to liberals such as herself, are under attack because she lost an election?
The election itself was an expression of key American values and freedoms, such as the right to vote. Did she feel somehow entitled to win that election?
It’s a good thing that the Clinton’s aren’t Catholic.
If Bill walked into the Confessional, the Priests would have to Tag Team to keep up with him.
I was one of many who prayed about the election. Trump’s victory was an answer to prayers of mine. Hillary being denied the White House answered prayers of many.
A number of years ago I was invited by a friend who was a prison chaplain to participate in a “Prison Fellowship” weekend at the state prison (PF is one of ministry programs that Charles Colson began). The prisoners who attended this event were in the “Special Management Unit” (SMU), facility and were normally locked down in their cells for 23 hours a day. After two days of formal and informal interactions with these inmates I came to conclude two things: (1) There really are authentic, Bible-believing Christians in prison and (2) Thank God there are prisons! I met some very dangerous criminals and some obviously very disturbed individuals in there!
I don’t want to be unfair, but if it is ‘private’ why are we reading about it from The New Yorker?
1/2 The Greatest Crime Couple in the history of this fabulous republic.
The headline alone makes me wretch.
So how does she explain her lying thieving behaviour in light of her fluency
Apparently the author doesn’t comprehend the difference between praying and witnessing or that there are personal prayers that shouldn’t be shouted and public prayers that are meant for public participation.
Sorry, but maybe that's so obvious to you that you don't think it necessary to explicitly state - but could you please explicitly state what the number-one tactic of prisoners is?
Prevaricating?
Telling the listeners exactly what they want to hear?
Distracting from the real issue?
Etc.?
Regards,
Maybe someone should have told her that you aren't supposed to do those things at the same time.
Well, at least she spared telling us about her experimentation with coffee-enemas and drinking her own urine.
Regards,
Maybe she should pursue the chemtrail and reptilian conspiracies.
the Lord, he uses the good ones, and the bad ones use the Lord
A bottle of vodka?
The Clintons are evil sociopaths.
They were born that way—their beliefs are after-the-fact justifications.
Their public statements about their beliefs are bald-faced lies.
The MSM that covers for them are evil sociopaths.
case closed
It’s funny, though how someone might be handed debate questions to cheat a debate and says “Thank the Lord!” or maybe when a witness to some other crime mysteriously dies they say “Hallelujah!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.