Delaware Judge Holds that State Constitution Does not Apply in State Parks, Forests

Gun Watch ^ | 25 December, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

[Redwood71]

I see you are a student of the law. But here’s the quandry: if you look up valid, you can find something like this, two definitions-

legally binding due to having been executed in compliance with the law.
“a valid contract”
or
“legally or officially acceptable.”

If you look at Black’s Law Dictionary, probably the foremost used in the legal field, it says:

“Of binding force. A deed, will, or other instrument, which has received all the formalities required by law, is said to be valid.”

All the formalities opens up a huge gap in the defining of a product. And the determination of that is the based weakly and weekly on the opinion of whoever got asked last.

An example of that is when they had Hilary dead to rights allowing sensitive information to leak from the server in her basement that had everything in it from Chelsie’s dress size to doctored secret and higher level national security information. It was also reported on Rush’s show that it was identified she had trained her staff how to patch and paste to remove OPSEC/COMSEC marks to remove the document identification on the information they were passing illegally. But they didn’t prosecute her because they claimed no intent. There’s always a stretch somewhere, it seems.

red

[Stanwood_Dave]

Gee, first thing that came to my mind, 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights, also see section(s)

§ 241: --- If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any ...

§ 242: -- Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, ...

I guess I'm just a right wing wack job.

In case you don't know just what that double "S," stands for, / means, simply means "Sub-Section."