Posted on 09/08/2016 8:51:34 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Hmmmmm . . . is it possible that Comey may wish to keep his job in a Trump administration?
How would designating Herself! “Too Big to Jail” help him keep his job in a Trump administration?
Herself! administration maybe, but not Trump.
Everyone should remember that Comey is no longer a registered Repub. One would then have to assume that he has gone over to the dark side.
Comey? ARE YOU paying attention OR are you waiting for the presstitutes to tell you what is really going on?
Hussein was on an aircraft going to NC with Hillary when the FBI fix was announced.
Who does the FBI Dir work for? WHO does the AG work for? Hussein said Hillary would NOT be indicted, she wasn't.
Hussein Obama, America's FIRST Muslim President, needs Hillary to stop Trump. As part of Hillary's deal for the Presidential pardon, she agreed to not only continue the Muslim invasion of America, she has said she will increase the number of peaceful Muslims by FIVE TIMES over Hussein's quota.
Every Muslim terrorist knows the Muslims have no chance of winning on the battlefield against the US. BUT as POTUS, Hussein can flood in Muslims that will overload the welfare system but more importantly it will eventually make the Muslims a political force. IT's all about making Sharia Law the law of the land and shredding the US Constitution.
I think it is pretty obvious that his boss ordered him to let her skate.
He said: “Yeah, I’ll do that” and then proceeds to do everything to sabotage her campaign.
Right after Trump cancels all of B-O’s executive orders on day one, he should fire Comey, and start obstruction of justice proceedings against him.
His only hope is to continue revealing the criminal truth of HRC in hopes Trump will win in November & Clinton can then be indicted, convicted, & jailed.
The other thing that explains it is....arkancide
Not really
He has done everything to make himself look like a dishonorable fool
Is that better than defying his bosses and recommending her prosecution anyway? I guess we could debate that all day long. But he’s giving us a lot to work with, so we’d better make the most of it.
Make the most of it how? That evidence needed to be given to a grand jury. The alternative left to the public Comey was supposedly serving is simply to make a lot of noise, not vote for her, and off she goes with her hundred million fortune thumbing her nose at honest citizens for the rest of her life.
The author's case is that Comey has, despite a complete stone-wall order from the President, helped keep the country from an unimaginably toxic squatter in the White House. It's something, but it isn't what he's taken a generous public salary to do.
His situation is not unprecedented. During Watergate Nixon ordered special prosecutor Archibald Cox fired for refusal to bend on the matter of subpoena for the missing tape evidence, and both Attorney General Elliot Richardson and assistant AG William Ruckelshaus resigned rather than do so. However that entire affair came out, that is the behavior expected of a public servant, not as Comey did: lick the boots of the politically powerful, throw out evidence to a public who can do nothing about it but protest, and then congratulate himself publicly on a job well done. Sorry, not buying.
Comey has a ten year term and can’t be removed
Comey is a CORRUOT COWARD!!! So are his AGENTS!!
Then Comey SHOULD have resigned!!!
I clicked the link and will read the article. If there is an upside to this disaster I want to know it.
I’m sure there are ways he could be fired. He wasn’t appointed king.
That indicts Comey pretty badly.Comey? ARE YOU paying attention OR are you waiting for the presstitutes to tell you what is really going on?
There's actually more to the piece (otherwise, the title--"More support for the theory: Comey is sabotaging Obama's order that he let Hillary skate"--wouldn't be appropriate). In a way, the rest of the piece fits the rest of your post.
There should've been the indication in the thread that this quotation is an excerpt, not the entire text. When I visit the page, I find a large block of advertising space after "pretty badly," and I can see how some people may stop reading at that point and conclude that the text ends there. Of course, sometimes people also omit that indication anyway.
(If I were the writer or an editor, I also would've worded "That indicts Comey pretty badly" differently. For example, I'd prefer wording like "would indict." This wording might make it clearer that the piece continues beyond the second paragraph, and it'd be less confusing for people who for whatever reason stopped or paused reading after the second paragraph.)
Agree...bet that is the right answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.