so you figured you'd click the link simply to show your azz... is that it???
Posted on 06/12/2016 5:47:31 AM PDT by SteveH
I am sending this to everyone that I know, and will ask them to do the same. The 2nd to last paragraph has been part of my knowledge and being for years, but few that I know are willing to admit this to themselves. This first-hand account may not change that (De Nile ain’t just a river in Egypt, you know), but it will get some off of the fence to vote for Trump, and get some leaning to Hillary to stay home.
I urge everyone who sees this to do the same. Millions need to read this and understand what is happening in our country.
This is misleading. I dont want to hear any argument
= = = = = = = = = =
Very misleading - if that is the true headline.
If truncated, part of the MOST important part is left out - happened March 12 which SHE has in her second sentence/paragraph.
Friday 6/10/ he was in Richmond and VERY EARLY on the Richmond PD said there would be NO SHENANIGANS and when you figure VA is a right to carry state - even though probably not get into the arena, the PRO Trump on the outside could very well be armed.
Not saying mobs being armed is a ‘good’ idea, but one tends to quit spitting at you or taunting you with sticks etc IF there is the slightest chance of meeting ‘The Judge’ on the street BEFORE you get arrested...And if this ‘Judge’ speaks, one may meet their maker long before they are ready.
You spittled, “I do not care about the problem you caused.” You cruzites are, in the end, just selfish cry babies. America doesn’t matter to you in your petulance. You sling specious accusations regardless of the falseness of your accusation. In the end, you are allied with the violent ones seeking to end the Republic, just because you children did not get your way.
so you figured you'd click the link simply to show your azz... is that it???
“the MOST important part is left out - happened March 12 which SHE has in her second sentence/paragraph”
Sounds like you’re defending the writer
Deliberately misleading. Period
“the MOST important part is left out - happened March 12 which SHE has in her second sentence/paragraph”
Sounds like you’re defending the writer
Deliberately misleading. Period
Sounds like you’re defending the writer
= = = = = = = = =
Definitely NOT.
I am referring to the HEADLINE WE HAVE.
it does imply - at the very least - last Friday.
Whoever put up the headline or whatever, left out the date WHICH the writer clearly states very early in the text.
The writer/producer of the headline led to the ‘confusion’ and, if nothing else, probably should have noted it was truncated.
No
On ‘further review’, whoever posted the article probably posted it as written.
That is based on the text that stated she waited a couple of days, so the poster should have indicated the date, the writer laid out the time line .
So if that is defending the author, so be it.
The author did nothing wrong -in this case- as to the presentation of the headline to US, some months later.
Believe it or not, I am NOT trying to ‘beat a dead horse’, just trying to clarify.
No excuse
I have. Been reading hetween the lines of liberal agenda for well over twenty five years. This is the tactic. Liberal propaganda isn’t propaganda because it’s liberal. Itspropaganda because it’s propaganda. Anyone can come on this site, no matter how long they have been affiliated and attempt or succeed in getting the reader to think a certain way
This headline grabs. The reticle written by the very same headline writer with every capability and responsibility to provide a proper headline does so getting the reader to think this happened this past weekend two days ago.
We wonder, where are the major papers? This is what’s going on and the papers are not repeating. It must be old news that this regularly occurs
It is frightening, ominous, divisive and leads one to react.
It is meant to do so.
Then look at the reactions.
This is absolute propaganda
Keep on trying, but You are wrong
No. It’s not. It happened three months ago in a.year long campaign
As the pastor passed by me briskly, I started yelling at him as he stormed around thru the crowd.
"Free Speech is Real" I yelled repeatedly. He kept repeating "Fuck you, white bitch" and flipping me off, at one point smacking his hand with middle finger into my rally sign I had in front of me and into my face. I was not hurt, but shortly after my altercation, that same man got into the scuffle you all have seen on the news.
Democrats and their thuggish 'victim group members' ARE the terrorists... they beat up Trump supporters, they kill gays in Orlando.
Today's mass killing in Orlando - yes, the killer was a democrat AND a 'radical Muslim.
It's time for democrats to look inward and see who they are... and who they're protecting. AND STOP BLAMING CONSERVATIVES
i simply copied and pasted the original title without thinking much about it since it is my impression that that is the official FR policy for posting articles. The author is probably not a practiced writer, but taking liberties with FR policy is something I generally try to avoid.
Sorry if there was a misunderstanding...
when i posted the article, i also posted the date written, which is march 17, 2016.
a reader can easily read that the title refers to a friday but does not reveal the date. then the reader can simply read the date of the article, which is march 17, 2016, and realize that it is not about a current event, but about an event which happened on the friday before march 17, 2016. the friday before march 17, 2016 is march 11, 2016. therefore the careful reader is able to discern the date of the incident being described (march 11, 2016) before reading the article.
assuming an article that is ambiguously titled is referring to any particular date without checking available clues is an assumption and we all know about assumptions.
:-)
Sorry if there was a misunderstanding...
= = = = = = = = = = = =
NO problem on my part.
I finally ‘figured out’ that the headline was proper with the story - at the time of the story.
I guess the only thing you could have done - without changing the meaning etc was to put (3/16) behind it...
..
yeah, i think i was tired when i posted it and maybe it was early. also i had already entered the entire thing as an “extended news” article but FR rejected it giving the reason that it was from a blog and i had to start over, which on my buggy windows laptop is not a trivial matter. speaking for myself, reading the article seemed to be relevant to other sisuations such as the san jose trump rally, so my first priority was to get the article posted. so i probably just did that with no frills, hoping for the best...
Yeah right
Thanks SteveH. New topic, but info from March.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.