Posted on 02/22/2016 1:03:35 PM PST by the_boy_who_got_lost
Joe, this is the very issue which told me he is someone I will never vote for. In Iowa, he not only said he'd keep or increase the ethanol mandate but that he would use the EPA to enforce it to the fullest extent of the law
He has already said he has absolutely NO INTENTION OF GETTING RID OF THE EPA.
Considering the damage the EPA has done to American industry, rights, private property, and even the environment, "Making America Great Again" is going to be a really tall order. That chunk of cognitive dissonance, which I have been pointing out to any who would listen since before the caucuses in Iowa voted, is a deal breaker for me.
Thanks, I just wish those like this author with eyes to see and ears to hear would actually do so,
PROOFS:
The entire point of this post -- and 95+% of FR respondents missed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.