Posted on 01/22/2016 10:50:22 AM PST by Flick Lives
IMHO, it was worse than nothing. GWB actually had his DoJ lawyers before the USSC arguing to uphold Wickard v Filburn.
Absolutely. And Bush can take credit for Raich v Gonzales,
which used the Commerce Clause to destroy our republican form of government.
WHY do you believe his so fervently? This is a sincere question.
and getting America out of the 'sewer cities' of America!!!
Huh?
If you haven’t figured it out by now, you never will....
That was the case where it was argued to uphold Wickard v Filburn. That case is a wellspring of constitutional abuse that needs to be stomped into and mud hole and then walked dry, and instead of grasping that opportunity he turn on us.
He also set a precedent with the Patriot Act that Obama used with the ACA of handing Congress a massive piece of legislation and demanding that it be voted on without anyone getting a reasonable opportunity to read it first.
Poll FReep: If the election were held today, who would be your first choice for President of the United States?
...it might seem that National Review's organized resistance of "thought leaders" opposed to Trump is a big deal. But that incorrectly assumes "thought" was ever important. In the 3D world of persuasion, National Review's move is nothing but throwing the gun at the monster. On some level, people can feel that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.